patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

$75,000 Worth of Guns Stolen During Big Gun Armory Burglary

Thieves smashed front door glass to gain access to the store.

 

DACULA, GA -- Just hours after a large shipment of weapons arrived at a local gun store, burglars struck the shop and stole numerous handguns, tactical rifles and shotguns.

According to business owner David Duncan, Big Gun Armory received two large deliveries on Friday afternoon. Duncan said the 65 guns were immediately placed on display since store inventory had been heavily depleted due to increased sales related to the election, the Connecticut shootings and holiday shopping.

Then, at 1:47 a.m. on Saturday, Dec. 29, Duncan got a call from his alarm company -- the burglar alarm had been activated. Gwinnett County Police were also notified and arrived four minutes after getting the call, but it was too late.

“They cleaned my place out,” Duncan said.

According to Duncan, the burglar or burglars entered the store by smashing the front door glass, reaching through the bars and unlocking the door. Duncan explained that he initially had a keyed lock on the interior and exterior of the door, but was instructed by the fire marshal to switch the interior keyed lock to a twist lock for safety purposes. As a result, the burglar or burglars were able to access the interior of the store without damaging anything other than the glass.

You might also be interested in reading:

Once inside the store, the burglar or burglars opened the display cases, removed the handguns and took the rifles and shotguns displayed on the wall.

“For them to have been in there and out as quick as they were, there had to be several people,” Duncan said. Duncan estimates it would have taken four or five people to empty the store so quickly.

The exact number, however, is currently unknown due to an installation error in the video surveillance system. The system, Duncan explained, was supposed to be set so that when the cameras detected motion, recording would begin within a few seconds. Instead, the technician that installed the system reportedly set the motion activation delay for 45 minutes. By the time the video began recording, all that could be seen were police going in and out of the store, Duncan said.

Though the incident was not captured on video, Duncan said crime scene investigators were able to obtain numerous prints from the scene. Duncan is also checking with surrounding businesses to see if any of them have exterior video surveillance footage that may have shown the suspects or the suspects’ vehicle.

In the meantime, Duncan is in the process of providing the serial numbers for all the stolen weapons to police in the hope the guns will surface and lead to an arrest.

“I’ve got to believe it was someone who saw those shipments,” Duncan added.

If you have any information about the burglary or if you noticed any suspicious activity in the vicinity of the store Saturday night, please contact Gwinnett County Police at 770-513-5000.

“I just hope they catch them,” Duncan said. “They racked up when they hit my store.”

Duncan is still sorting through records attempting to determine exactly which guns were stolen. As of Dec. 31, he had confirmed 45 were stolen but believes 65 are missing. Duncan estimated the total value of the stolen weapons to be $75,000.

 

    About this column: The police blotter is a listing of criminal activity reported by the Gwinnett County Police Department. Information is based on media releases, incident reports and data available through www.crimemapping.com. Information regarding those charged with a crime is taken directly from Gwinnett County Police Department reports and the Gwinnett County Sheriff’s Department's Docket Book. Arrested individuals have been charged with, but not convicted of, the above listed crimes. Related Topics: Big Gun Armory, Burglary, and Guns

    Todd M

    10:05 am on Monday, December 31, 2012

    As an ardent supporter of 2nd ammendment rights, and an avid gun enthusiast myself, this news saddens me. To me the lack of common sense is the biggest enemy to our 2nd ammendment rights. As gun owners (and retailers) we have to protect our rights like they are made of the finest gold or material. We know that those who appose gun rights are looking for any reason to attack, and to use public opinion against us. To allow ANY chance that our guns can easily be stolen is beyond unexusable. I get that the fire marshal required a new lock, but when that lock was put on you should have had ways to secure your firearms. If they were just displayed on the wall for anyone to get at, that is a problem. I realize that I do not know the full story, nor do I know this shop owner (as I frequent other shops), but to me this seems avoidable. I have an equal problem with gun owners that do not have a secure way to lock a gun when they leave it in their car, or a way for them to secure their AR's, shotguns and rifles at home, so a burglar can come in an steal them. At least with a home owner there is a chance that a burglar doesn't know you have guns to steal, but a gun store? I would think that anyone who sells guns in our community should be held to a high standard. They should be locked in safes or at least not easily accessed in a way that people could make off with all of these guns in 4-5 minutes. Avoidable...sad.

    Reply
    Comment_arrow

    Another Poetlake

    2:49 pm on Monday, December 31, 2012

    Would you, then, be agreeable to a law that, when a weapon used in a crime was traced backwards, held some kind of punishment for the careless owner that allowed it to be stolen? i have always felt that there are some gun owners that allow their weapons to fall into the wrong hands either through carelessness or simple lack of interest in what the weapon was going to be used for.

    Comment_arrow

    Darrel

    3:23 pm on Monday, December 31, 2012

    No Poetlake, I would not be agreeable to that. The day a judge is held liable for a repeat offender is the day I may agree to the gun owner becoming a victim twice.

    Comment_arrow

    John Walters

    3:40 pm on Monday, December 31, 2012

    The only way this story makes any sense is that the owner is in on the robbery. There are too many as you pointed out impropriety's to the way the guns where stored and protected. You write this was avoidable, I agree since it was a inside job.

    Comment_arrow

    Leon Hauser

    6:09 pm on Monday, December 31, 2012

    Thank you to all of yo 2 nd amendment feaks. Gun sales go up when nuts cause grief
    take the blame we do not need those combat wepons on the street. Founding fathers meant one shot ball weapons. The would turn in their grave to see what havoc you have caused. May bee more guns in the schools will help. You are all nuts

    Comment_arrow

    Marty Hashbrown

    7:05 pm on Monday, December 31, 2012

    Amen, Brotha!! I hope the Feds see through the BS, as well.

    Comment_arrow

    Airborne Alltheway

    8:13 pm on Monday, December 31, 2012

    My friend you made a great point. This is the type of person that don't need to be selling weapons of course we that carry will take the heat for his actions.

    Theresa

    10:54 am on Monday, December 31, 2012

    I would check the security alarm guy, why would he set the timer for 45 minutes? If he is that stupid, I don't want him doing my alarm system.

    Reply
    Comment_arrow

    Dave

    1:39 pm on Monday, December 31, 2012

    This all sounds suspicious. The alarm guy needs to be thoroughly grilled by the investigators......even the store owner...

    Comment_arrow

    john

    1:57 pm on Monday, December 31, 2012

    exactly the alarm guy is a major suspect and the people who were working on the delivery and their friends/associates. the fire marshal might have had something to do with it but maybe not. Why would motion activated cameras be instaled! at a gun store i would want full servailance. this is very suspicious

    Michelle Couch

    12:53 pm on Monday, December 31, 2012

    Shouldn't higher-risk businesses like this one be required to have additional security measures in place by city/county ordinance? For example - retractable steel bars beyond the glass front? That would at least slow a thief down. Such special/similar requirements are in place for liquor stores, adult material stores and, adult entertainment businesses. Why wouldn't local government consider such an ordinance for legal arms retailers? Even the UPS Store in Grayson has a retractable security system protecting it's printers/copiers as it offers 24-hour access to its mailbox customers. Not only from a local government standpoint, but you would also think a gun shop owner would have exercised better security measures.

    Reply
    Comment_arrow

    dan-du-man

    1:00 pm on Monday, December 31, 2012

    talk to the moron fire marshal.

    Comment_arrow

    Jack

    1:28 pm on Monday, December 31, 2012

    I agree with dan-du-man.....had many dealings with fire marshals and they tend to make really stupid rulings on such items. As in this case he allowed an easy access to a business that should of had the key lock type door. All business have a sign on each door that states "These doors to remain unlocked during business hours", why was a hand turn type lock required? Because the fire marshals have no common sense.

    Comment_arrow

    R++ - One of the famous "Dacula Crew"

    9:04 pm on Monday, December 31, 2012

    Sorry you can’t really gig the fire marshal here…

    But those guns appear to have been secured at an even “lower level” than mowers found outside most Home Depots, they at LEAST have a security loop wound through them.
    It seems a take away for security handling review may need to be considered by the county / city going forward.
    This from someone who doesn’t believe we SHOULD add anything more to the government plate - but since they already administer zoning , conditions, business licenses and inspections it’s not a BIG leap at all…

    T Rock

    12:56 pm on Monday, December 31, 2012

    I would blame both the fire marshall's advice and definately the alarm company- why even have a delay setting for 45 minutes? 45 seconds is too much delay. Of course the gun grabbers will use this as an excuse for banning guns but as usual if criminals want something they will try to get it one way or another. I hope they get caught and all the guns are kept out of the wrong hands.

    Reply
    Comment_arrow

    jasco27

    1:41 pm on Monday, December 31, 2012

    The fire marshal was correct. You cannot lock customers in a business, regardless of what items they are selling. He (or she) would be liable if someone was injured or hurt during business hours if they were locked in. The fault lies with the shop owner not properly securing his weapons.

    Mike

    12:58 pm on Monday, December 31, 2012

    See how stupid the Democrats are? They push to ban guns, only to increase demand and now people are running wild for guns, including stealing them.

    Reply
    Comment_arrow

    P

    3:06 pm on Monday, December 31, 2012

    Hopefully, these guns were stolen so they could be destroyed and unavailable!!!!!
    Perhaps someone did a public service....if so, kudos.

    Comment_arrow

    JennySmart

    3:57 pm on Monday, December 31, 2012

    So it's the fault of the Democrats? Really? In this country, people have been running wild for guns since the Wild West days, and have never outgrown their little-boy fantasies --- they may not all wear play cowboy suits but the mindset is the same. And the so-called "legal" owners of guns are the best source of weapons for the bad guys who are more than happy to steal them.

    Comment_arrow

    Bob Dobalina

    4:28 pm on Monday, December 31, 2012

    Hasn't been any attempt during this administration OR Clinton's for that matter. In fact the only talk of any kind of gun control I've heard of (before all those kids were killed) was from a bunch of paranoid a$$wipes on the right. Stick around a while there Goober, watch to see who's in office when they DO come to take your guns. I'll just bet its a Republican Congress with a Republican President.

    Comment_arrow

    Bobby Mcgee

    7:29 pm on Monday, December 31, 2012

    Yeah those stupid democrats should have made sure those guns were locked up properly and that the idiot shop owner's security cameras were operational.

    Comment_arrow

    Tony Jacik

    9:23 pm on Monday, December 31, 2012

    Both parties have members that are NRA members, not that being an NRA member is illegal, after what I have been reading lately I may join myself. We elect an offical to go to DC and represent the constituents back home and more people live in hunting areas than in big cities. While the left is screaming about guns I do find it amusing that the assault weapon ban expired in 2004, from 2006-2008 the democrats won back the House and Senate and from 2008-2010 the democrats held control in all three Houses. The democrats even had an extremely rare super majority in the Senate, I don't understand why the most vocal left wing radical for gun control Sen. Diane Fienstien did not try to extend the assault weapon ban or introduce new anti-gun legislation. With control of all three Houses and a super majority in the senate the democrats had enough seats to over ride any GOP filibuster, Obama or Fienstien or any other democrat could have passed or repealed any legislation they wanted without any GOP opposition, they had a filibuster proof senate for two years and control of all 3 Houses but I guess gun control was not an issue just 3 short years ago.....

    dan-du-man

    12:59 pm on Monday, December 31, 2012

    I would sue the fire marshal for forcing him to make his shop accessible to crooks.

    Reply
    Comment_arrow

    Sal

    2:05 pm on Monday, December 31, 2012

    What I did was change my lock to a knob on the inside. When I was sure (about a week) the inspector was not coming back , I changed it back. That lock was only use when we closed for the night and no one was in the store. I am sure this Gun Shop did not keep the door locked when the store was open for business.

    Comment_arrow

    Bobby Mcgee

    7:32 pm on Monday, December 31, 2012

    Good luck with that. The Fire Marshal did his job. The Gun shop owner was irresponsible and shortsighted. The consequences for that lack of common sense will undoubtedly be reported on the nightly news in the form of death.

    Joey Shotts

    1:00 pm on Monday, December 31, 2012

    Unfortunately - with the looming threats of registration/taxation/seizure, you'll be seeing a lot more of these crimes. I guarantee those guns will never be registered, taxed or seized by the Government.

    Reply
    Comment_arrow

    j benso

    1:39 pm on Monday, December 31, 2012

    They are going to be a new export shipment to mexico.

    Comment_arrow

    P

    3:07 pm on Monday, December 31, 2012

    Hopefully destroyed!!

    MiMi

    1:01 pm on Monday, December 31, 2012

    And just what kind of SOLUTION does WASHINGTON have when such as this happens.......

    Reply
    Comment_arrow

    R++ - One of the famous "Dacula Crew"

    9:06 pm on Monday, December 31, 2012

    Issue Federal Work Permits .... hey you asked.

    David Broder

    1:07 pm on Monday, December 31, 2012

    I'm in Agreement with Todd M if the Conn. shoter had to deal with a lock first most likely the whole incident never would have happened.

    Reply
    Comment_arrow

    Tracy Deabler

    2:11 pm on Monday, December 31, 2012

    The front door of that school was locked. He broke through a window of a classroom.

    R Hanley

    1:08 pm on Monday, December 31, 2012

    was the owner aware of and Did Owner agree to 45 minute delay to record camera. If he did this would have me asking him questions. Also when the lock was changed bars should have been modified so could not reach in to open door after breaking glass.

    Reply
    Comment_arrow

    Marvin Autry

    1:37 pm on Monday, December 31, 2012

    I agree...sounds like an inside job.

    Comment_arrow

    R++ - One of the famous "Dacula Crew"

    9:08 pm on Monday, December 31, 2012

    The insurance bond review should be really fun for the new year!

    luis cabrera

    1:11 pm on Monday, December 31, 2012

    So much for gun controls and background check

    Reply

    Mike

    1:17 pm on Monday, December 31, 2012

    This is hysterical. Think Billy Bob and Bubba Lee can track them thar rifles down or were they they culprits?

    Reply

    Todd

    1:21 pm on Monday, December 31, 2012

    Jewelry stores lock up all their inventory at night. It may not be physically possible to lock-up all the guns at night - but to have them secured with a locking system seems common sense. There are a lot of blunders on this one...each compounded to make this an easy target... Hope other gun shops take this as a case study. I don't want the gov't having any more reasons to crack down on legal gun owners...

    Reply

    Ron

    1:26 pm on Monday, December 31, 2012

    This is the first time I`ve heard of a gun store closing an leaving their gun out in display cases an racks.The gun stores i know always lock their guns in safes I though that the FFA required that of a gun store if not your insurance company should.

    Reply
    Comment_arrow

    Bob Dobalina

    4:36 pm on Monday, December 31, 2012

    This sounds an awful lot like a collection of Goobers starting with the gun shop owner. I'm guessing that he was too cheap to hire a real alarm company and had a relative do the job. Then, when the fire marshal insisted on a turn lock, (strange request I think, considering that they lock would only be used when the shop was closed), the store owner should have had a barrier welded in place. Even my company's shipping area has that! If this guy is still allowed a dealers license after this fiasco, there is no justice.

    GB

    1:31 pm on Monday, December 31, 2012

    Probably an inside job. The lock, the camera delay and the shipment of guns had to be someone with the knowledge of what was going on. They just couldn't have been that lucky, but looks like they were.

    Reply

    Jody adams

    1:31 pm on Monday, December 31, 2012

    Well sure funny how he did,nt really have them locked up very good.All the Gun store where I live Have real good System and all guns all locked wherer you would have to cutt every gun loose

    Reply

    Tina

    1:33 pm on Monday, December 31, 2012

    Hopefully anti gun thieves took them and are going to destroy them and not have them out in the public in the wrong hands AGAIN!!!!

    Reply
    Comment_arrow

    Roger Farnham

    2:05 pm on Monday, December 31, 2012

    Are you really that naive? Steal them to destroy them? If that was the case why not just burn the store? Those guns are worth thousands and will be worth more on the black market that will be created if people like you get their wish for gun confiscation.

    j benso

    1:36 pm on Monday, December 31, 2012

    Guess we need more background checks on video camera installers. Maybe the finstien 2nd amendment ban might help the background check on the thiefs....

    Reply

    Mark

    1:39 pm on Monday, December 31, 2012

    This is simple, it was staged by the anti-gun lobby.

    Reply

    Richard Epcar

    1:42 pm on Monday, December 31, 2012

    Everyone should be worried about this. Even if the crooks could get into the shop-these guns should have been secured and locked. Everyone is to blame for this, the Fire Marshall, the alarm guy (who I'm not so sure he's not in on it-who triggers an alarm for 45 minutes after the fact?) and yes, the shop keeper. They are all negligent, and should all be held accountable. In the meantime-a boat load of weapons are in the wrong hands.

    Reply

    jimbolee

    1:48 pm on Monday, December 31, 2012

    Most gun stores that I know of take their guns off of display at the end of the day and lock them up in numerous high security fire safes that are bolted to the floor and weigh at least 5000 pounds. I don't know why this business wouldn't do the same, or why the fire marshal would have made him change the locks system he had when it is a commercial dwelling. And why not test the security camera system once a month at least??

    Reply
    Comment_arrow

    knick fan

    1:52 pm on Monday, December 31, 2012

    I'm with you! That whole story is suspect. Just when the laws pertaining to these types of weapons are being debated and will most likely change.

    jimbolee

    1:48 pm on Monday, December 31, 2012

    Most gun stores that I know of take their guns off of display at the end of the day and lock them up in numerous high security fire safes that are bolted to the floor and weigh at least 5000 pounds. I don't know why this business wouldn't do the same, or why the fire marshal would have made him change the locks system he had when it is a commercial dwelling. And why not test the security camera system once a month at least??

    Reply

    knick fan

    1:49 pm on Monday, December 31, 2012

    Things that make you say "Hmmmm"
    How'd the burglars know the shipment was coming in? If the main purpose of the camera is to video anyone breaking in, why would you have a 45 minute delay?
    If the camera was to activate with movement, how could the installer think a 45 minute delay would be appropriate? 45 minutes is enough time for an[ [amateur] burglar to get in find what they want, leave and sell whatever was stolen. I think they need Sherlock Holmes for this one! That owner to me is very suspect!

    Reply
    Comment_arrow

    j4downs

    4:40 pm on Monday, December 31, 2012

    Who in their right mind would set up a security camera and not do a test run to make sure it is set up correctly? Grilling the installer would be my main priority.

    Comment_arrow

    Bob Dobalina

    4:44 pm on Monday, December 31, 2012

    How about working on the premiss that this is an inside job. That the thieves not only knew about the shipment, the new lock, but also where exactly the alarm controls were located, and that THEY set the delay of 45 minutes. We now have a lot of guns that will be likely covered by the insurance company so the owner will get his money back, and (possibly) will still be able to sell them "under the counter" to his militia buddies without any paperwork, or ship them off over the border, of just hold onto them in the hopes of selling them at some future date when he hopes they will be banned and worth far more money.

    Tom

    1:50 pm on Monday, December 31, 2012

    I am sure the nitwits will say this wouldn't happen if you ban guns.
    Banning alcohol sure worked. The war on drugs sure has worked.

    Reply
    Comment_arrow

    CLB45

    2:13 pm on Monday, December 31, 2012

    Felons ARE banned from having guns. And stealing is against the law. Maybe we should ban criminals. Problem solved.

    Comment_arrow

    Jose

    2:26 pm on Monday, December 31, 2012

    The best way to protect schools---malls--theaters is to hire Armed guards , plus bullet proofing all school doors and windows...Kids should be search for weapons. All school visitor search----all school kids should go through a metal detector. That is what it will take to keep schools--malls--theaters safe..People who are mentally ill----people who have lost all hope ---many will go out like Lanza---and like Holmes did. They want to take as many with them as possible, they blame their problems on others.. Former Marine who know a few things about security. Happy New Year.

    Comment_arrow

    Diogenes

    2:47 pm on Monday, December 31, 2012

    Jose--perhaps we should just build a bunch of prisons with bars, armed guards and high walls. then we could all live in them and just keep the criminals out.

    Ted Smith

    2:03 pm on Monday, December 31, 2012

    OK, LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, ANOTHER "GUN CONTROL" FAIL!!!!! THIS IS THE WAY THAT THE CRIMINAL ELEMENT GETS GUNS!!!! "GUN CONTROL" WORKS ONLY IF THE FIREARMS ARE OBTAINED LEGALLY!!!! IN THIS INSTANCE, THE BAD BOYS GOT WHAT THEY WANTED WITHOUT ANY BACKROUND CHECKS, INTERVIEWS, OR LICENSES!!!! BUT OUR LIBERAL/RADICAL PRESS & POLITICIANS TURN BLIND EYES & DEAF EARS TO THOSE FACTS!!!!

    Reply
    Comment_arrow

    Jose

    2:18 pm on Monday, December 31, 2012

    And after the Ar 15 is banned ? they will steal them from people who have them.. 25 million legal AR 15 out there ?????/

    Comment_arrow

    Diogenes

    2:41 pm on Monday, December 31, 2012

    Please get y'alls caps lock key fixed!

    Comment_arrow

    JennySmart

    3:34 pm on Monday, December 31, 2012

    Yes, GOT THEIR GUNS FROM AN AUTHORIZED GUN DEALER WHO WILL SUFFER NO PENALTIES DUE TO HIS STUPIDITY, WHO OBVIOUSLY WAS NOT OBLIGATED BY LAW TO TAKE SAFETY MEASURE TO AVOID THIS. "LEGAL" OWNERS AND BUSINESS ARE THE BEST SUPPLIERS OF WEAPONS TO THE BAD GUYS!!!

    Comment_arrow

    Bob Dobalina

    5:01 pm on Monday, December 31, 2012

    You know Teddy, I used to be offended when people blamed the liberals for even thinking about gun control until I found out the real definition of the term liberal, a liberal is anyone who doesn't have his entire head parked up his hind end. In other words, an air breather, as opposed to a methane breather. You would be genuinely amazed at how many liberal own guns. Some of us own LOTS of guns and go to lots of gun shows. We do tend not to buy from idiots who post stickers whining about "liberals", but there are enough good businessmen out there who recognize that their buyers are not all knuckle dragging types. BTW, there's no such thing as the "liberal media" and saying so only serves to make you look as ignorant as Sarah Palin. The media is almost exclusively owned by the corporations, the corporations tend to favor the Republican Corporatists (AKA Fascists), and the Republicans are not usually considered "liberal". Hope I didn't lose you there.

    Comment_arrow

    R++ - One of the famous "Dacula Crew"

    9:14 pm on Monday, December 31, 2012

    IF it’s a ligit business there will indeed be penalties galore, insurance and bonding renewals will be “a trip without leaving the farm...”

    Tracy Deabler

    2:05 pm on Monday, December 31, 2012

    Sounds like an inside job to me. Also, no one in there right mind is going to plan a robbery like that in one night, the "crooks" had to pf known about the shipment coming in before hand, not just seen it being delivered. Also the "accidental" 45 min delay on the camera.... sound like it was on purpose. The gun owner... every shop I've been into has a system that they lock up all guns when closing up shop for the day, what gun shop owner leaves them all out on display, either a crooked one or a lazy one. Either way it sounds inside to me, the "crooks" knew the shipment was there and that the guns wouldnt be locked up obviously. Shop owner, security manager and and shipment supplier need to be checked out in my opinion.

    Reply

    Jose

    2:16 pm on Monday, December 31, 2012

    LIBERALS THREAT OF BANNING ASSAULT WEAPONS ? HAVE PUT 5 MILLION MORE AR 15 ON THE STREETS IN THE LAST 3 WEEKS.. HOW MANY AR 15 ON THE STREETS TOTAL ?? 25 MILLION ?? BANNING THEM IS NOT GOING TO SOLVE THE SCHOOL SHOOTING PROBLEM...

    Reply
    Comment_arrow

    Sheriffchris

    2:38 pm on Monday, December 31, 2012

    WOW ! First the Fire Marshall talks him into a unsafe security practice. Next the Police arrive within 4 minutes of the Alarm, but all the guns and robbers are gone. To top it all off .....a technical mistake setting up keeps all the cameras off for 45 minutes. I'd check for inside job ...

    Comment_arrow

    Diogenes

    2:44 pm on Monday, December 31, 2012

    So you are saying that iberals bought these guns? Or was it the invasive paranoia of the purchasers?

    Comment_arrow

    JennySmart

    3:36 pm on Monday, December 31, 2012

    IT WOULD HELP A LOT, BECAUSE IT WOULD MEAN THAT THIS SHIPMENT TO THIS DEALER WOULD HAVE BEEN BANNED AND WOULD NOT BE ON THE STREETS NOW!!!

    Comment_arrow

    R++ - One of the famous "Dacula Crew"

    9:16 pm on Monday, December 31, 2012

    Bans don't / won't work - we have ALREADY done that...

    Need a different approach unless “BANNING” is all you can type.

    Comment_arrow

    Pam J

    9:17 pm on Monday, December 31, 2012

    Jose, what do you suggest should have been done? Say, go ahead and keep buying those assault weapons? There is no easy answer, but please quit blaming the "liberals". And nobody needs an assault weapon. I hope that even the Republicans can agree with that.

    Comment_arrow

    R++ - One of the famous "Dacula Crew"

    10:15 pm on Monday, December 31, 2012

    @Pam
    By that same logic, it can also be CLEARLY proven that NO ONE NEEDS alcoholic beverages...
    (Especially now that FEDERAL tax dollars are in play by ever greater numbers going forward for HEALTHCARE.)

    I may not wish to own one personally, but I firmly believe any Legal Citizen has the right to them if they choose to. Just like many choose to chug a brew or two.

    You may not have a requirement for one in your life, but this is a REALLY big country they have uses elsewhere…

    Dan green

    2:22 pm on Monday, December 31, 2012

    According to the NRA the more guns that are out there the safer we are. Also accordingly the 2nd amendment everyone should be free to carry guns so what's the big deal they were just enforcing their 2nd amendment. Right????

    Reply
    Comment_arrow

    JennySmart

    3:38 pm on Monday, December 31, 2012

    Exactly, I guess we're a lot safer now with this new shipment on the streets! All together now: Yeay for the NRA!!

    Comment_arrow

    R++ - One of the famous "Dacula Crew"

    9:20 pm on Monday, December 31, 2012

    Sorry the NRA stands FIRMLY against lawbreakers.

    This was after all a ROBBERY by CRIMINALS - the type of sots that ignore bans, don't register their firearms, will take ANYTHING you have, generally don’t play fair and WANT to take YOUR FAIR SHARE!

    TB Player

    2:46 pm on Monday, December 31, 2012

    This just solidifies the fact that Criminals will not obey Gun Laws no matter how you restrict them. Criminals do not buy their guns, they steal them. It isnt the guns, it is the Society that needs reigned in.

    Reply
    Comment_arrow

    JennySmart

    3:43 pm on Monday, December 31, 2012

    Another logically-disabled gun lover... THIS shipment, for one, would not be on the streets if guns were restricted and this dealer had not been allowed to SELL THME LEGALLY... The "bad guys" steal them from the LEGAL OWNERS, GET IT??? No legal owners, hundreds of thousands of weapons not available for stealing... GET IT?

    Comment_arrow

    R++ - One of the famous "Dacula Crew"

    9:22 pm on Monday, December 31, 2012

    The thieves would have STOLEN them elsewhere - that’s the ONLY difference.

    But they may have had to work a LITTLE harder tis all.

    Comment_arrow

    Tracy Deabler

    12:17 am on Tuesday, January 1, 2013

    To Jenny.... so we should all have to give up our guns because idiots may steal them? I guess I should throw all my knives to the dump also just incase some freak wants to cut people up with them.

    Relsom

    2:52 pm on Monday, December 31, 2012

    I don't believe I trust this report. In a CCTV system there is typically a Pre-motion setting which saves to disk beginning this period before motion is detected and a Post-motion setting which ends recording for this period after motion ceases to be detected. It would not make any sense at all to have a delay after motion is detected before recording.

    Reply

    Ernie Morris

    3:14 pm on Monday, December 31, 2012

    Lets set the record straight the store owner is a scumbag liar. His alarm magically is faulted, this idiot never tested his alarm to make sure it works, nothing like an actual robbery to find fault. This guy is a LIAR, he has dangerous merchandise and it is taken the same day it arrives..who did he hand the invoice to? How big is his insurance policy and who collects? Add to it a lock that someone can stick their hands through a window and unlocked guns..hmmm I hope this JACKHAT IS SHOT WITH HIS MERCHANDISE serve him right.

    Reply
    Comment_arrow

    R++ - One of the famous "Dacula Crew"

    10:19 pm on Monday, December 31, 2012

    Yes here’s another of the HR Block 127 reasons many don't support firearm restrictions, because of the likes of some of the attitudes on display right here.

    Funny, the same ones who often stand for “rehabilitation of the thief” and compassion “for the incarcerated and their families…” wish the VICTIM here harm - go figure.

    Ernie Morris

    3:17 pm on Monday, December 31, 2012

    Relsom exactly a delay of any type defeats the purpose of security and who the heck has a 45 minute delay as an option. Then to say he is cooperating with authorities, just like he cooperated with the robbers.

    Reply

    Phil S.

    3:24 pm on Monday, December 31, 2012

    This is terrible - the lack of physical security for these weapons. I wonder if the posters on hear screaming about the shop owner had anything to say about the 2,000 guns delivered to Mexican drug gangs as a result of Fast and Furious - probably not.....

    Reply
    Comment_arrow

    R++ - One of the famous "Dacula Crew"

    9:31 pm on Monday, December 31, 2012

    Those weapons don't count, they were accounted for under Joltin’ Joe Biden’s Stimulus Spending ..

    Jon

    3:26 pm on Monday, December 31, 2012

    I always locked my business doors with keys on both sides, this makes the burglar go back out the same way he came in. I also locked and bolted my roll up door to prevent someone getting equipment out without some major inconvenience. I never had a problem with the Fire Marshall, I just had to add a sign that said "door must remain unlocked during store hours".

    Reply

    John Walters

    3:30 pm on Monday, December 31, 2012

    This story should not be about the guns stolen buy how they were stolen. This has got to be an inside job. The guns should have been locked in an alarmed reinforced cabinet when the store is closed or there needs to be a armed Security Officer on duty. I worked as a Security Officer and Manager for 15 years so I am at a loss as to how the access to the store could be so easy, trying to blame the fire marshal is lame at best. I believe the alarm was not on when the thieves broke in, but was set off as the left to make it look like a normal break in. This looks like a Insurance scam by the owner. I understand there was a Security Officer on duty in the parking lot, was he sleeping or in on the robbery? I hope the police do a background check on the owner this guy to me is a prime suspect.

    Reply
    Comment_arrow

    JennySmart

    3:47 pm on Monday, December 31, 2012

    Wouldn't it be nice if REAL thorough background checks were done on all wannabe owners including gun dealers, checks requiring more than 10 minutes on the internet, that is, and done BEFORE any license was issued?

    Comment_arrow

    R++ - One of the famous "Dacula Crew"

    9:35 pm on Monday, December 31, 2012

    It would be REALLY nice if the FEDERAL Government would require nonresident ILLEGAL aliens to provide documentation or LEAVE.

    Since they have had over 30 YEARS to do that and STILL can’t or WON’T get it right, I don’t think they CAN or SHOULD handle anymore firearm regulations at this point in time… it's a PROVEN waste.

    knick fan

    4:00 pm on Monday, December 31, 2012

    Insurance scam or a way to sell on the black market for triple the cost.

    Reply

    JennySmart

    4:04 pm on Monday, December 31, 2012

    Who knows, maybe the thieves ar performing a public service by stealing the guns before they find their way legally into another household -- after all, privately owned guns kept in a home for protection against potential "bad guys" are more likely to be used to kill a family member or friend than a "bad guy", not to mention the children that are killed or injured accidentally.

    Reply
    Comment_arrow

    Bobby m

    6:09 pm on Monday, December 31, 2012

    You are a bafoon! Guns are a tool, don't blame the tool blame the one who uses it with bad intent on the innocent. The problem is that there is no moral compass left here in the U.S. and by the way more family members and children are killed in car accidents then by guns. So by your logic lets ban cars.

    James

    4:16 pm on Monday, December 31, 2012

    Was it an inside job? Within hours of the delivery the "burglars" arrive? The lock was changed for safety reasons, making a break-in easier. The loss is now a tax write-off to the tune of at least $75K, plus damages.

    Reply
    Comment_arrow

    Michelle Couch

    1:28 pm on Wednesday, January 2, 2013

    It would be interesting to know if the gun shipment was COD or Net 30 Terms?????

    David Peavy

    4:16 pm on Monday, December 31, 2012

    I agree with Todd up above....but I'd also like to point out that those guys could not have cleaned out the store in 4 minutes. The fact the weapons were NOT under lock and key says alot.. Sounds like the owner should be investigated. If not the local police perhaps the insurance company could determine how a weapons dealer was hit the day the guns were delivered and why it was so easy to burglarize a weapons store in 4 minutes? Just wondering......

    Reply

    gdmn2find

    4:26 pm on Monday, December 31, 2012

    I am also a supporter of the 2nd Amendment, but this reeks of inside job. Too many coincedences for it not to be. I don't want to blame the owner outright, but someone who is employed there was involved for it to happen this soon after an influx of weapons, quickly accessing the store and removing the weapons as fast as they did. there doesn't seem to have been enough time for an outsider to plan this kind of breakin and be as successful as it was. the clincher is the camera security system. who was responsible for the settings for recording or the system administrator.

    Reply
    Comment_arrow

    j4downs

    4:43 pm on Monday, December 31, 2012

    Who would set up a security camera and not test it to make sure it is working correctly? First priority is to grill installer.

    Robert Massey

    4:54 pm on Monday, December 31, 2012

    Sure sounds like an inside job to me.

    Reply

    Shane Reynolds

    5:18 pm on Monday, December 31, 2012

    I really hate this for David. He took a chance opening a store on this side of town, and I'm glad we have him. Yes, he should have checked out the surveillance system functionality before it mattered (and I am sure he will be filing a claim with the company's E&O carrier), and yes, he should have figured out a way to secure the front door after the fire marshall required a change of the interior lock, but I'm sure David feels terrible about what has happened, and he will likely pay a hefty price in insurance deductible and premiums going forward. I have a hard time believing this would be an "inside job" when guns are flying off the shelves thanks to unconstitutional threats from our President and members of Congress. Piling on David doesn't help anything at this point. Sadly, though, the criminal element in our county may have just become better armed, so that is another reason to carry and take training classes (Dead Center and Trigger Time both offer classes). As an extension, I would also recommend families talk through a disaster/defense plan. There are some things you just cannot defend against, and for those instances, I have to say, "let's go meet Jesus." But I don't think it's unreasonable to have a plan for a few guys kicking in your door and coming in to rob you. God bless, and Happy New Year!

    Reply
    Comment_arrow

    R++ - One of the famous "Dacula Crew"

    9:41 pm on Monday, December 31, 2012

    The Fire Marshall crack is just plain sad – it’s not like these matters aren’t covered in PUBLISHED State / Local Code or anything.

    Every time its brought up, it makes it smell just a little bit fishier…

    oldbrowncoat

    5:57 pm on Monday, December 31, 2012

    Been there. Good store, good people. I will support their businesses more from now on till they get through this. My business has gone through this same thing many times. You can't stop someone determined to break the law. I have put in some very extreme security measures in my building and the theives did way more damage to my building than what they stole. Hell, I'd just assumed give them what they took instead of them destroying my building.

    Reply
    Comment_arrow

    R++ - One of the famous "Dacula Crew"

    9:43 pm on Monday, December 31, 2012

    That may apply to twinkies, but this topic takes it to a WHOLE nother level...

    Relsom

    6:14 pm on Monday, December 31, 2012

    I can't comment on weather this was an inside job or not but there were a whole lot of things this store did wrong for this kind of theft to happen.

    Reply

    Gladiator0719

    6:18 pm on Monday, December 31, 2012

    The damn Dems took them, most criminals are in fact registered democrats.....BTW, most places lock up the weapons in vaults after closing time, even if it means closing a little earlier or staying 15-30 overtime.....

    Reply
    Comment_arrow

    Relsom

    10:05 am on Tuesday, January 1, 2013

    Actually, most politicians are criminals....but seriously folks, I don't think common street criminals care about politics one way or another, vote, or much less register under any particular party banner. Yes, tighter physical security is the surest way to prevent this kind of thing from happening. Alarms allow for a smash and grab and video merely gives us a historical record after the fact.

    John willing

    6:20 pm on Monday, December 31, 2012

    What a bunch of dumb asses. Anyone who thinks video would help has to believe that they were not wearing masks. Dumb. All we would know is how many and shown the video to the world so they could learn how to clear the store in less than four minuets.

    As for a glass door on a gun shop.........that goes beyond stupid.

    But it would not have mattered. I have had my store robbed twice.
    They just cut a hole in the roof.

    Reply
    Comment_arrow

    R++ - One of the famous "Dacula Crew"

    9:45 pm on Monday, December 31, 2012

    This again focuses on internal physical security

    Race (not racist)

    8:03 pm on Monday, December 31, 2012

    Better check eric holder's crib. Course, he usually deals in larger quanities...

    Reply
    Comment_arrow

    R++ - One of the famous "Dacula Crew"

    9:49 pm on Monday, December 31, 2012

    Just look for a crate or 2 singing in muffled, hushed tones “Arizona wants me, Lord I can’t go back there …”

    Tony Jacik

    9:08 pm on Monday, December 31, 2012

    As a veteran and a rifleman in my VFW Honor Guard and someone who proudly has two military shooting ribbons, one for a rifle and one for a handgun, I also have my carry permit. I agree, it is the criminals and whackos that are hurting us honest citizens and now are making us fight to keep our second amendment right to own a gun and protect ourselves and our family. I see the caos going on in Mexico where the average citizen cannot buy a gun yet drug cartels have fully automatic weapons, Mexico has had more innocent citizens killed in the last 5 years than Americans lost in the Vietnam war. As a veteran I will defend the 2nd amendment rights of the honest law abiding citizen to own a gun, my Honor Guard rifle is an M-1 grand which I have clearence to keep at home, it shoots blanks but can shoot live ammo too. I must keep it locked in a gun safe behind a locked door. My personal gun I keep on my night stand until I leave the house then it goes into my holster, it is no longer safe to go to a mall, see a movie or drop the kids off at school anymore without being protected.

    Reply
    Comment_arrow

    R++ - One of the famous "Dacula Crew"

    10:08 pm on Monday, December 31, 2012

    @ Tony
    Thank you for your service but You may wish to consider deleting the specific locations WHERE you keep weapons from your post...

    Benny M

    1:44 am on Tuesday, January 1, 2013

    Sounds like someone had a plan together, and someone didn't.

    Reply

    Pischer

    10:44 am on Tuesday, January 1, 2013

    If I were investigating, I'd grill everyone who worked in that shop on any job in the past few weeks. It's possible that it's just a lot of coincidences, but after a point that seems unlikely. None of the lacking "security measures" make sense in isolation, much less taken together. I'm sure the police will be checking into all that, and I wish them luck.

    Reply

    Ks

    11:23 am on Tuesday, January 1, 2013

    Well reading these posts are enlightening, but my thoughts are that any gun owner is responsible for securing their weapons properly and gun laws are for the innocent not the criminals. They will get guns in other ways, you put more bans on weapons your just hurting the innocent. The majority of gun related crimes the guns were not purchased through dealers. Yes this owner could have secured his inventory better and checked his system but how many of you check your security systems weekly like the owners manual tells you to do? The 45 min delay was wrong and should be looked into. I think common sence plays more of a roll in gun control than one persons opinion.

    Reply

    Gatewood2002

    3:26 pm on Tuesday, January 1, 2013

    With the threat of of American citizens becoming unarmed, you will see the "prohibition" attitude take place. Fear, greed, and law abiding citizens becoming outlaws.

    Reply

    Tammy Osier

    4:53 pm on Tuesday, January 1, 2013

    There's regular glass on the door of a place that sells weapons????

    Reply
    Comment_arrow

    Shane Reynolds

    5:40 pm on Tuesday, January 1, 2013

    What do you mean by "regular glass?" It appeared to be commercial glass, same as banks, jewelry stores, etc.

    Kerry Walker

    5:00 pm on Tuesday, January 1, 2013

    ...and why did it take so long for the police to show up? This entire story is amazing! How did these guys know that they could get into this place just by breaking the glass? How did they know that the camera was on a 45 minute delay? How did they know it would take sooooo long for the cops (or anyone for that matter) to arrive? Those were some very lucky crooks!!

    Reply

    R++ - One of the famous "Dacula Crew"

    5:41 pm on Tuesday, January 1, 2013

    Police arrived ****four minutes**** after getting the call, until Capt Kirk gets the transporter fixed that's DARN impressive response time...

    Proving once again when seconds count, even the best and brightest government response is a mere minutes away.

    Reply
    Comment_arrow

    Mr. B

    6:28 pm on Tuesday, January 1, 2013

    But how long before the alarm company called the police. If they are like the one I previously used, the person monitoring it would need to quit texting his girlfriend before he could make the call.

    Comment_arrow

    R++ - One of the famous "Dacula Crew"

    11:25 pm on Tuesday, January 1, 2013

    True there are those pesky false alarms ...

    But unless our police officers are required to learn and practice Vulcan Mind Meld techniques, response to an incident will still require a simple call.

    Comment_arrow

    Tony Jacik

    5:13 pm on Saturday, January 12, 2013

    And that is inside the city limits, I live in the country at the end of two counties, some of my property is in one county and some is in another so people living out this far the response time would be 10 or 15 minutes maybe longer. Even in the city limits, if an intruder breaks in your house you can wait the 4 minutes for the police to respond or one millisecond for my pump shotgun or Sig Sauer .357 to stop the intruder or intruders. Tough call, either the county sheriff and local PD or Sig and Remmington, when seconds count and your families safety is at stake which two would any of us rely on?

    Tammy Osier

    6:22 pm on Tuesday, January 1, 2013

    It's kind of like a pharmacy, only weapons. There's got to be better security to install in a place like that. Definately following the investigation on this one.

    Reply

    Tammy Osier

    8:10 pm on Tuesday, January 1, 2013

    Todd M., I was reading what you said. A thought came to my mind. When in Walmart, you can't even purchase a camera or a Cd without someone removing an individual lock with an alarm on it. You are so right in your assessment.

    Reply

    EAR

    5:55 am on Wednesday, January 2, 2013

    I just hope and pray it wasn't teens that took these guns. That's all we need another Connecticut shooting in our home town.

    Reply

    MO

    3:28 pm on Saturday, January 12, 2013

    Wow, this scares me! I live less then a mile from the store in question and to think I have so many naïve and simple minded people living in close proximity to me and my family will have me constantly looking over my shoulder. Musketball boy- the second amendment was meant to put the citizenry on par and equal to soldiers (not artillery men or other special weapon units so don't go there) but largely the folks that would be the tools of a tyrannical government. They are absolutely needed and necessary, and as a quote attributed to T. Jefferson one said "The beauty of the second amendment is that it will not be needed until they try to take it".

    Reply
    Comment_arrow

    Tony Jacik

    4:51 pm on Saturday, January 12, 2013

    So true MO, very few people believe we would ever need guns to fight off a tyrannical government, throughout history looking back at Spain, France, Italy, Germany all democracies that need up being ruled by a dictator or even just corrupt officials. I live in Tennessee a VFW member told me about a movie that was made in 1992 called "the battle of Athens" it had to do with a corrupt sheriff in Athens TN. In 1946 WW 2 veterans returning home did not like the way the local officials were running the town and one decided to run against him and they used force to take the voting ballot box out of the post office to the town jail. The returning veterans went to the armory and took as many rifles as the could and attacked the police station. So be it local, state or federal the citizens need arm to keep corruption in check and fight for their constitutional rights, None of the veterans were charged with any crime and one was elected mayor of the town and the corrupt sheriff went to prison, the founding fathers knew only too well how easily governments can become corrupt and abuse their power and they also knew that keeping the citizens armed would be the best way to fight off corrupt governments. Good luck finding this movie, I am sure you could google "the battle of Athens" to read the story which I did but I still want to see the movie.

    Tony Jacik

    5:02 pm on Saturday, January 12, 2013

    Just goes to show that criminals will get guns at any cost even if they have to steal them. I just watched a show about the drug cartels in Mexico, a country where the citizens can only have low caliber guns that must be approved by the government and only one per household, they cannot buy assault weapons and machine guns are outlawed completely. A country that has also had more innocent citizens killed by guns in the last 5 years nearly 70,000 that the US had combat deaths during the entire Vietnam war. Deaths from fully automatic AK-47, in fact one of the men the reporter was talking to said that he could get her a fully automatic AK-47 with two full clips for $1,000 US dollars no questions asked. So even if the US banned every kind of gun in the states criminals would be able to buy them, we would only disarm the honest law abiding citizens. I believe if that ever happened there would be even more guns because there would be a demand for them and we cannot stop millions of illegals from coming across the border or stop all the tons of drugs coming across we would not stop guns from coming across either.

    Reply

    Leave a comment