patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Airport Expert's Report Confirms Briscoe Field Viability

Debate continues on the pros and cons of privatizing Briscoe Field.

 

Kinton Aviation Consulting, a leading consulting firm to the aviation industry, released a report that should assist the Gwinnett County Citizens Committee in determining how to move Briscoe Airport forward.

The report identified key factors that point to success, should the redevelopment and subsequent addition of passenger service be permitted at the County airport, including gate constraints at Hartsfield International, potential ease of use and navigation of a smaller facility, convenience and increased competition in the Atlanta market providing travelers with more options, according to a press release by Angela Reba, spokeswoman for Propeller Airports.

Propeller Airports was the only entity to respond to the county's Request For Proposals back in February.  The RFP was issued in December after much discussion by commissioners and public discourse that still continues.

However, before the RFP process began, Propeller had said that it wanted to begin commercial passenger flights at the county-owned airport. 

Specific findings in the report include:

  • The more gate-constrained Atlanta Hartsfield-Jackson becomes, the more it limits competition and ease of use for local passengers.

  • The capacity constraints of Atlanta will drive the future success of airports within a 500 mile radius of metro Atlanta.

  • Local travelers will utilize an airport that is closer, significantly less congested, easy and quick to navigate and offers choice.

  • Secondary airports probably have a better long term potential if major airports in the region become gate-constrained.

“Our experience in Boston showed that when secondary airports offer viable alternative service, economic development increases across the whole region,” said Thomas Kinton, President of Kinton and former head of Massport – which oversees three airports including Boston Logan as well as over a dozen critical transportation entities -- in a May 17 press release.

“With airlines flying in and out of Providence and Manchester Boston, the greater Boston area saw more destinations served with direct flights, competitive pricing and an ease in congestion. We believe the same thing would happen in Atlanta, which would be great for area residents.”

Brett Smith, CEO of Propeller Airports, agreed with the sentiment.

“Redeveloping Briscoe Field will improve the travel experience for metro area residents and create a significant amount of local jobs,” said Smith. “People deserve to finally have another choice; Atlanta is the only major top 10 metropolitan area in the United States without a secondary airport.

The fact that the region only has one option negatively impacts Atlanta’s economic competitiveness and its standing as a world class city.”

Proponents of privatization -- which would not necessarily mean commercial flights -- see it as a way to improve the airport's economic performance and to reinvigorate the county's economy. Most of the vocal opposition comes from residents who live near the airport and are concerned about flight noise and declining property values.

Earlier this month, the Airport Privatization Citizen Review Committee, which was set up by the Gwinnett County Board of Commissioners to study the feasibilty of allowing a private company to run the county-owned facility, voted 6-0 (with five committee members abstaining) to keep the facility as a general aviation airport.

Related Topics: Airport, Briscoe, briscoe field, and briscoe field privatization

Jim Regan

11:30 am on Friday, May 18, 2012

One really needs to be careful about these press releases by Propeller. They tend to cherry-pick and distort facts. Unless the report received by Propeller was different that what the Gwinnett DOT provided to the Briscoe Citizens Committee Mr Kinton's report actually indicated little hope for expanding Briscoe.

When asked, "How likely is it that a carrier, would be attracted to serve a new airport (like Briscoe) which has never had scheduled passenger service and has no proven history of a market at that particular airport?" he replied, "In this circumstance, it is highly unlikely."

Read the full report for yourself at the www.bettergwinnett.org , both Kinton and Boyd's responses are included in the article - Q& A Responses of Aviation Industry Analysts

Reply
Comment_arrow

Crystal Huskey

11:32 am on Friday, May 18, 2012

Thank you Jim, I will look at it.

M.K. Osborne

11:54 am on Friday, May 18, 2012

Snake oil salesmanship at its best!

Reply

Potato Patch Tommy

2:05 pm on Friday, May 18, 2012

I'd like to hear from Mr. Kinton myself, in person rather than read snipets of information here and there. Is it too much to ask the County to bring in either Mr. Boyd or Mr. Kinton and PERSONALLY address the state of aviation whether Briscoe can support commercial aviation Better yet, bring in the Cato Institute to discuss privatization and let's public form their own opinion.

Reply

Jim Regan

2:34 pm on Friday, May 18, 2012

The Briscoe Citizens Committee would have liked that also, but we were limited to written questions. If you control the process, most of the time you can control the results. This time the citizens committee relied on the cold-hard facts, for which there are many. Expansion proponents never provided independent reports or studies to support their claims.

Imagine saying expanding Briscoe will increase home values, because the values of homes near Weschester NY are higher than Briscoe. Never mind the fact that Westchester County is one of the wealthiest counties in the entire country. I'm sure that if someone studied residential values across Westchester County they would find more expensive homes are located away from the airport and flight path.

Reply

M.K. Osborne

2:35 pm on Friday, May 18, 2012

They know the public opinion on this and that is why they search for anybody who can back them up and show that the public is wrong.

Reply

GregRodgers

3:24 pm on Friday, May 18, 2012

The major issue that Brett Smith continues to deny is....People in the area do not want it... They didn't want it in Barrow County either...

When this is all said and done....I hope that the remaining 2 BOC members (lassister is quitting) are run out of office for hoisting this nonsense on the people for such a long time.

Its truly disgusting.

Brett and his pals are simply going for broke at this point. I believe they see the writing on the wall and figure...what the heck lets throw the kitchen sink and see what happens.

Reply

Leave a comment