patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

What Do You Think About Stiff Fines for Unbuckled Pets?

With strong support from the New Jersey Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, pet owners in New Jersey face much stiffer penalties for unbuckled pets in vehicles than they do for not buckling up their children.

 

Northjersey.com Road Warrior John Cichowski reported last week that Col. Frank Rizzo, police superintendent for the New Jersey Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, issued a warning that any motorist found driving with an unrestrained pet will face a penalty much stiffer than the $46 fine issued to unbuckled drivers and passengers.

Penalties for unrestrained dogs range from $250 to $1,000 and carry a sentence of up to six months in jail.

Rizzo told reporters the rationale for the enactment of this new law is that dogs become projectiles in a car accident if they are hanging their heads out of the window. For the moment, we don't have that law in Georgia. Dogs can still be found on front seats of cars, ears blowing in the wind, or barking at passing cars from the bed of a pickup, but it's always possible that could change. 

So what do you think? Should pet owners be forced to restrain their pets while traveling? And what about fines -- should they be higher than the fine for not restraining a child correctly?

Related Topics: question of the day

Patch_comments_icon

Gail Moore

10:38 am on Thursday, June 7, 2012

The rationale is that dogs become projectiles in a car accident? How weird. Would probably carry more weight if it was geared towards dogs can be a distraction to safe driving - like texting, applying mascara or drinking hot coffee!

Reply

North Georgia Weather

12:24 pm on Thursday, June 7, 2012

I think a law about putting on makeup while driving... although maybe it should just be a law for being stupid. :-) That would cover most anything people do on the road.

And a law to tell me what to drink, how to speak, what to eat... and on and on. Please, protect me from myself, I'm too stupid to think for myself so come up with a law for that too.

Geez...

Reply
Patch_comments_icon

Vanzetta Evans

12:30 pm on Thursday, June 7, 2012

Right Gail. I always get nervous when I see someone driving with a dog in their lap. The dog might take the driver's focus off the road or reduce their reaction time. And what about the pup? If there was an accident and the dog got hit by both the airbag and the driver? That certainly would NOT end well! I say keep them secured-- for their safety and yours.

Reply

Scott

12:35 pm on Thursday, June 7, 2012

I've always wished for a law to require pet owners to have their pets restrained. I'm always sick of being next to somebody that lets their dog hang their head out the window and bark at other cars. Then there are the little old ladies that have lap dogs that at stop signs you see the dog laying against the steering wheel only to fall off into the lap when the driver begins moving and swerving because of the added weight on the wheel.

As a parent of a young child I feel that if it's a law to restrain my self, and my child to keep us safe then there should be the same for any living rider in a car. I've seen pet owners care about their pets as though they are their children. Why don't they take the time to love their pet enough to restrain the pet while in the car to protect it in case of a crash?

I don't like the article's point that the pet becomes a projectile rather than being for the safety of the driver and the pet. The pet wouldn't be any more a projectile than the trash that is sitting in the console or on the front seat of most cars these days.

Restrain your pets people! It's just smart! Love your pets....keep them safe! Don't make the government tell you to do it....just be smart and do it yourself!

Reply

Scott

12:38 pm on Thursday, June 7, 2012

PS: my comment about "little old ladies" is just one point. It's really directed at anybody that allows a pet (big or small) to be anywhere near the driving portions of an automobile. Pets should stay out of the driver seat!

(I did not mean to offend any little old ladies....no little old ladies were hurt in the thoughts of this comment)

Reply
Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Gail Moore

1:41 pm on Thursday, June 7, 2012

As a little old lady, I think you for that PS!

Patch_comments_icon

Sharon Swanepoel

1:00 pm on Thursday, June 7, 2012

I saw a dog on the back of a pickup on 316 this weekend and it really bothered me. It wasn't restrained in any way. My thoughts were what if it jumped off, it would be in the middle of a busy highway. Maybe it's trained not too, but still, there's no predicting behavior in some instance. What if it's a male and an attractive poodle looking for love is in the area.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Scott

4:51 pm on Thursday, June 7, 2012

Do you recall the story about the dog found on I-85 against the center wall? AT RUSH HOUR? I'm not sure if the owner ever claimed it. I saw the story on WSB and FOX. Odd are something like that happened. During the stop & go traffic the dog jumped out of the back of a truck or something and the owner never knew it. Shame!

Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Deanna Allen

5:37 pm on Thursday, June 7, 2012

I don't trust my dogs, who are pretty well-behaved, to not try to escape and run off. I would never put them in the back of a truck, especially not unrestrained. At least in my car they are too big to fit out the window. : )

Comment_arrow

Grant

11:55 am on Friday, June 8, 2012

Those "morally challenged" poodles are an immense danger ! They are well known for corrupting our upstanding gentlemanly dogs and turning them into drooling hounds. Obviously these "tramp breeds" should be banned!
(kidding :)

North Georgia Weather

2:08 pm on Thursday, June 7, 2012

I don't really go for poodles though... ;-)

Reply
Patch_comments_icon

Sharon Swanepoel

3:17 pm on Thursday, June 7, 2012

And I would never refer to you as a dog, Steve. :)

Reply

Brian Crawford

3:32 pm on Thursday, June 7, 2012

I hear Chihuahuas are the most aerodynamic...but I wouldn't know anything about that.

Reply

diane

4:55 pm on Thursday, June 7, 2012

I tried seat belts. My dogs just got tangled up in them. They are a choking hazard. I have a barrier, from front to back seats. And a seat protector that keeps them from hitting the floor. It works.

Reply
Patch_comments_icon

Deanna Allen

5:27 pm on Thursday, June 7, 2012

I take my dogs for rides often and I can't imagine letting them hang far enough out a window to risk falling.

I saw someone driving recently with a Husky in the back seat of an SUV and the dog actually had its paws up on the window and its head and shoulders OUTSIDE THE CAR. I was terrified that this dog was going to fall out and I, being the person driving behind, would risk running it over. I stayed pretty far back and prayed for that poor dog.

My dogs get to hang their HEADS ONLY out of the windows and only at speeds below 45. Their eyes bug out otherwise and it freaks me out. And their jowls flap. Which is a pretty funny sight, but still. Every once in a while my little Boxer will crawl into the front passenger seat and lie down.

Reply
Patch_comments_icon

Deanna Allen

5:33 pm on Thursday, June 7, 2012

I added some pictures of my babies in the car. I love to show off my dogs. : )

Reply
Comment_arrow

Lisa Carlan

9:45 pm on Thursday, June 7, 2012

I think I see Boxers !!!! My babies have been shown on the Patch and I am thankful for that. Lisa

Patch_comments_icon

Sharon Swanepoel

7:50 pm on Thursday, June 7, 2012

And they are such beautiful babies Deanna!

Reply

David

8:21 am on Friday, June 8, 2012

I always take my dog in the car. When I drink too much, she drives us home. She has one seatbelt violation but only because the shoulder strap hurts her neck. The officer said she had to wear it regardless of whether it fit well or not since she was driving. Of course, she wouldn't have been pulled over at all if she had dimmed her lights to oncoming traffic.

Reply
Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Vanzetta Evans

9:36 am on Friday, June 8, 2012

Ok David! I've seen a dog ride a skateboard, a surfboard and a bike. But NEVER have I seen a dog drive a car! LOL!

Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Sharon Swanepoel

10:04 am on Friday, June 8, 2012

David, I think I've driven behind her on the way home some nights. You need to tell her to stay in the slow lane when she's driving 10 miles an hour under the speed limit. LOL

Crystal

10:17 am on Friday, June 8, 2012

I do understand why they're considering this law after seeing a large dog fly through the air past my windshield on 85. I was horrified, not just for myself but the poor dog. Traffic was heavy and it didn't stand a chance.

Reply

MDC

10:25 am on Friday, June 8, 2012

They make special harnesses for dogs so they don't get tangled in the seat belt. You can adjust the length so the dog has enough slack to stand up on the seat or stand up. My problem is one of my Jack Russells loves to chew the seat belt, so she has to be crated any time she's in the car. Talk about a projectile!

Reply

Grant

11:55 am on Friday, June 8, 2012

My dogs are too big for my cars.

Reply

Craig Reed

12:56 pm on Friday, June 8, 2012

Actually we can all take a lesson from the father of our next President and use a crate on top of the car for safe carriage of pets...or for our Democratic friends, a lesson from the father of our sitting President and transport pets in a cooler for a delicious mid-trip snack.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Brian Crawford

1:23 pm on Friday, June 8, 2012

Just for the record, that wasn't Mitt's father who strapped the poor dog to the top of the car, it was Mitt. That's our next President? Seriously?

Comment_arrow

Brian Crawford

1:31 pm on Friday, June 8, 2012

Not only that, but when the poor animal pooped himself Romney merely pulled into a car wash, hosed the dog down, and went on his merry way with the dog shivering in his crate on the roof of the car. According to Romney, his dog "loved it". If this were to happen today Romney would no doubt be charged animal cruelty. Jerk.

Patch_comments_icon

Kristi Reed

1:40 pm on Friday, June 8, 2012

@Brian - At least he didn't hold the dog down and shave his hair ...

Reply
Comment_arrow

Lynn Bacon, CPLC, CFC, CRC

2:28 pm on Friday, June 8, 2012

Kristi, we need a thumbs up button and an 'LOL' button!!

Comment_arrow

Brian Crawford

3:13 pm on Friday, June 8, 2012

Hahaha...true, but I believe the poor mutt was fired for the pooping incident.

Patch_comments_icon

Sharon Swanepoel

4:51 pm on Friday, June 8, 2012

David, that photo is priceless. Please upload it here and we will feature it! And no, that wouldn't be me. (Note to self, if ever on Hamilton Parkway again, wear a mask!).

Reply

Mitch

4:55 pm on Friday, June 8, 2012

I can see vehicular dogslaughter becoming a law anytime now. :)

Reply

Craig Reed

5:26 pm on Friday, June 8, 2012

Hey, we can at least all agree that Romney did not EAT the dog.

Reply

Leave a comment