By Nathan Horton
End Note By Kenneth Stepp
When the Gwinnett County Commissioners started discussing a uniform contract to provide solid waste collection for the residents of unincorporated Gwinnett County, and adding those charges to the resident’s property tax bill, I was hugely against it.
The thought of not having choice, the potential for waste, more government control over our lives, the very possibility that you could lose your home for not paying for trash pick-up, goes against everything I believe in.
Now, nearly 3 years later, while I have many of the same concerns, I am happy to say there have been some positive results. Illegal dumping has been greatly reduced since everyone now has trash pickup. This relieves a burden to many property owners who were forced to spend money to have trash removed because people did not have trash service.
There are fewer trash trucks clogging our busy roads and slowing traffic through our county. Probably the most important, is there is now only 1 day a week when trash trucks are rumbling through our neighborhoods. Before the trash plan, many neighborhoods were serviced by as many as 5 different companies each coming through with a different truck on a different day.
It was bad for the environment, our traffic, and put our children at unnecessary risk as these trucks raced through residential streets every day. Not everything is perfect however. Many residents felt that their right to choose providers should not have been stripped from them at all. No one likes the government adding fees to your property tax bill that have nothing to do with your property taxes and being able to foreclose on your home if you are unable to pay them.
Fortunately, Gwinnett County’s State representative from the 106th District, Brett Harrell, has submitted a bill to the General Assembly (HB- 159) to remove these fees from all county and municipal property tax bills, and make it illegal to add such fees in the future. Representative Harrell introduced this bill despite working for a large waste collection and recycling firm, where these fees could potentially benefit his company, because he understands it is the right thing to do.
So, how can the county continue to benefit from the obvious advantages of this solid waste plan while returning freedom and choice back to the residents? One solution would be to request bids from multiple collection companies. These bids would be made public for review and the voters in each district could vote for the company they preferred. If, as in my experience, the company has performed poorly and had bad customer service, do not vote for them. If another company has a lower price, vote for them. Maybe one company will charge a bit more, but will provide outstanding service, include large item or overflow pick up, or include yard debris in their bid. This company may be a great option for you.
The residents would get some control over the process, the prices would stay competitive, and service would almost certainly improve. This would continue to give the county all the benefits of the current plan, while returning control and choice to the residents, the voters, where it belongs.
Gwinnett has an election every two years. Simply find a way to make the choice of waste company part of that vote. The voters deserve a chance to choose and to have a say over who provides the services they pay for. This is a common sense reasonable middle ground solution to a complex and contentious issue that has been brewing in our county. As a free market advocate, I personally prefer no government regulation over services at all, but since they are involved, let’s return as much control to the people as possible.
The Mechanics Of This Compromise
By: Kenneth Stepp
Gwinnett County owns the cans and bins. This makes the transfer from one company to the next smoother.
Vote for a waste company every two years during the regular voting process.
Create a county website for citizens to post anything they want about the current company, good or bad. To keep things honest great care should be taken to confirm they are using their real name and address. This creates a deeper level of accountability and lets the waste company know if they have a specific problem with a specific route.
Disconnect the bill from property. It is wrong on more levels than this article has room for.
It is my belief that this plan is far superior to the one we have now, and a good compromise between the leadership and voters.
The benefits Are
1. A decent level of choice for the citizens
2. Competition leads to lower prices and better service
3. Relief of tensions between county leadership and citizens over this issue
4. This will likely be the largest contract the winning waste company will ever have. This will make them more responsive to the voice of the citizens than we have now.
k@kstepp.com
Kenneth Stepp
1:11 pm on Sunday, March 3, 2013
I would add that Nathan and I know we do not have every piece of info about this. What we hope to achieve is to start a conversation about something that the citizens are angry about. I use to be opposed to what we have and now like it much better than what we had. Nathan on the other hand believes strongly that what we have is wrong for Gwinnett and what we had, though flawed, is far better. If we can agree on this, then as a county we should be able to come together and make something work. The best of both is what we were going for. It's not perfect and some will hate any plan we do. But since ten out of ten people I've spoken with has strong feelings about this issue, and wants it changed. I thought putting something more solution based than reasons we can't change would be helpful. If you have an opinion pro or con please tell us.
George Wilson
2:10 pm on Sunday, March 3, 2013
I'm happy with the present system for all the reasons named in the above article. My only suggestion is for the collection company to provide a cart for recycled materials instead of the small containers have enough problems with just getting the votes to the polls much less having the garbage companies compete for votes. Will they be allowed to campaign? Given the low turnout of voters, this is a non issue. I wonder if all the complaints came mainly from people who never had the service and created the trash problems that we use to have.
R++ - One of the famous "Dacula Crew"
9:40 pm on Tuesday, March 5, 2013
Don't worry, as long as Gwinnett leaders believe that trash is an "essential service" there will be no competitive bidding, no public vendor selection and no voting.
That was all laid out in the Superior court records in Judge Micheal Clarke's courtroom. There will be no competitive bidding because by state law it isn't required under the heading of essential service.
(Normally applied with respect to EMS services).
The proper way to move forward would be for our voters to contact their commissioner and encourage the use of an ordinance to return to competitive bidding.
R++ - One of the famous "Dacula Crew"
9:05 pm on Wednesday, March 6, 2013
"I wonder if all the complaints came mainly from people who never had the service and created the trash problems that we use to have."
No most that have major concerns and expressed same appear to have several traits in common:
Comparison shopped and routinely obtained competitive prices.
Paid the bill and knew what services were available.
Understood that when government doubles bonding requirements in the millions, that businesses must raise costs to remain in business.
Remember claims of government officials that said the additional bonding fees were required to construct a reclamation center – one that never seemed to materialize, along with said bonding fees that weren’t returned to those businesses that paid them.
Attended several of both consultants' sessions and heard what the consultants actually did, comments made by many fellow citizens that apparently were ignored.
Attended many meetings of the BOC, the satellite committee sessions and heard the promises - then watched while they were discarded one by one.
Some even read the court filings / pleadings at GJAC, files that are feet thick and in so doing obtained a view into local governance that at times appeared to defy both logic and reason.
"What’s political is political, what’s legal is legal - the two don’t meet and shouldn’t have to.”
A quote from legal counsel for a hauler to Judge Clarke in his courtroom.
Sincerely,
The Insubordinate one
Nathan Horton
9:31 pm on Sunday, March 3, 2013
Hey George, I am a free market guy. I do not like the government forcing me to purchase a product or service from a private company. This is the same argument used by many in the Obamacare debate and they are correct too. Before the plan I was paying less than half of what I pay now, and for that lower rate, I received better service, yard debris removal, and large waste removal and overflow hauling as well. Under the new plan, I have poor customer service, much reduced services, and a higher bill too. It was a bad move for me and many of my neighbors...
George Wilson
12:45 pm on Monday, March 4, 2013
@Nathan Horton
My rates are lower and the service has been great..
Nathan Horton
1:39 pm on Monday, March 4, 2013
If your rate is lower now, you were getting ripped off before. We called 5 or 6 different collection companies, and negotiated a rate before choosing a provider and got a great deal. Apparently, this was little to no negotiation as to what the residents would be charged since my rate doubled. With a contract the size of a Gwinnett District the rates should have been lower for everyone...and never should have doubled for anyone.
Tommy Hunter
9:01 am on Monday, March 4, 2013
Always remember, the government can produce a myriad of "good" reasons why you should let it control more of your lives. And, most all of them end up producing more "revenue" for the government to use to come up with more reasons to control your life.
Kenneth Stepp
10:44 am on Monday, March 4, 2013
Tommy
You might be on to something.
Kristi Reed
4:52 pm on Monday, March 4, 2013
Exactly!
Nathan Horton
10:53 am on Monday, March 4, 2013
That is a very libertarian response, and I agree. We should seek to get the government out of our lives and our wallets as often as possible.
George Wilson
1:29 pm on Tuesday, March 5, 2013
To Conservatives and Libertarians, freedom is just another word for fleecing the most vulnerable. Their definition of the most vulnerable includes 98% of the US population. Left up to them, there would be no regulations whatsoever and people would be dying of contaminated food and medication, lack of accessible healthcare, no public education, etc. This isn't freedom. There is no freedom in misery.
George Wilson
1:29 pm on Tuesday, March 5, 2013
To Conservatives and Libertarians, freedom is just another word for fleecing the most vulnerable. Their definition of the most vulnerable includes 98% of the US population. Left up to them, there would be no regulations whatsoever and people would be dying of contaminated food and medication, lack of accessible healthcare, no public education, etc. This isn't freedom. There is no freedom in misery.
Mr. B
2:10 pm on Tuesday, March 5, 2013
George, I'm confused by your comments...AGAIN!
Are you saying that only the top 2% of citizens are Conservative or Libertarians? And the other 98% are oppressed by them? Is it all the 2% that fleece the 98% or just part of them? Do you have any idea of the meaning of the word freedom? Your definition ("another word for fleecing the most vulnerable") just doesn't make sense.
R++ - One of the famous "Dacula Crew"
10:08 pm on Tuesday, March 5, 2013
Sounds like someone may have been out riding on the bus with Bobby McGee and misunderstood the song...
If only Janis were here to explain it.
PTC Concerns
3:02 pm on Monday, March 4, 2013
I am happy to pay a litle more to remove trash trucks from my neighborhood 4 days a week. Prior to the change we had trash trucks rolling through all the time and trash cans lined up throughout the neighborhood any day of the week. I also like the fact that the county is forcing peopel to buy the service. You and I both know they were dumping it illegally before this. I don't get the yard waste service anymore, but as far as I can tell they haul away anything else as well as many more recyclables now. It would be nice to see gwinnett negotiate some lower rates. Peachtree Corners claims they are going to do a bettere job than the county, let's see what they come up with.
R++ - One of the famous "Dacula Crew"
10:07 pm on Tuesday, March 5, 2013
You do realize that you could have had this one day a week requirement met under the now replaced franchise plan, WITHOUT all the legal cost, consultant charges, substantially increased fees and 10 year lock RIGHT?
Oh yeah, along with not paying for a year of service in advance ...
If you are "Peachtree Corners", I hope you encourage your leaders to break out on your own, because as it sits - you're paying way too much for what you get.
Besides, its one of the three core charter service items of city-lite that was voted upon.
Kenneth Stepp
3:25 pm on Monday, March 4, 2013
PTC
You sound like me. My life is much better with the plan we have rather than the old way. But two things are missing. Competition, and choice. Our idea was to work together on a solution that suited us both. Nathan hates the plan we have now. It was our belief that if two people that had totally different views could agree on a plan, then maybe the plan would be viable. We both know this is simplistic. The citizens of our county do not like the plan we have. Not because it doesn't work, because they did not choose it. So we wanted to start a conversation about solutions.
Tommy Hunter
3:56 pm on Monday, March 4, 2013
Just a FYI, illegal dumping hasn't been curtailed in the least. You can't force people to buy neatness and pride. I can take you to several places right now, where folks let their garbage pile up on their garage while the trash can sets outside. I am compiling a book of pictures of illegal dumping for later use---some of it on my friend's property. And, once building gets going good again, it's gonna get worse. You see, we don't have the right to use the power of government to eliminate the two things common to a free society---inconvenience and risk, yet, as people become more urbanized that is exactly what happens, and most often started by so-called "conservatives". What should be done is to use our entrepreneurial spirits to find a more convenient and less riskier way. I default once again to my comment above.
George Wilson
1:32 pm on Tuesday, March 5, 2013
@Tommy Hunter
You need to report these people to code compliance now. They do a great job of keeping our county looking good.
Kenneth Stepp
4:07 pm on Monday, March 4, 2013
You're right Tommy. The heart and soul of people seldom change. My old friend David Gary (God rest his soul) always said "Them that's born bent, don't die straight". He was from Albany so say his quote with a country twang out of respect. And "conservative" is a term thrown around about many types of people. Most of them believe they would make great neighbors. The ones that do not keep up their homes are not.
Ed Varn
7:32 pm on Monday, March 4, 2013
I love this "only one truck one day a week" scenario. So, why doesn't Gwinnett County also limit landscapers to one day/one week service. Or delivery trucks, i.e. DHL, FedEx, etc. Why stop with just trash pickup?
My rates are higher than they were before, and service isn't nearly as good; never had recycling spilled and left in the street with my old carrier. And paying for it upfront for 18 months so the county could make a little interest off it? C'mon, this was one of the biggest ripoffs in history, created and put in play by Mr. Hunter's not lamented predecessor.
I can very easily take care of my trash needs without the government's intervention where it has no expertise and no place to begin with. And less dumping? Take a look at the lake in Hamilton Mill sometime. Or, better yet, Five Forks near Reagan Pkwy. There's always trash there. And it doesn't necessarily come from Gwinnetians. People from other counties dump over here all the time.
To make a poor pun, this whole plan is "rubbish."
R++ - One of the famous "Dacula Crew"
10:03 pm on Tuesday, March 5, 2013
Of course our poor side streets supposedly couldn't handle the truck traffic stress when they were running with lesser loads in the past.
Now the rigs run full and heavier, so by the laws physics how did we extend our infrastructure's life spans again? Have we changed apparently substandard road construction standards as a parallel effort yet?
This project serves as a loan to the general fund of about 35+ Million or so for six months free and clear. All things being equal we should ensure our county doesn't become accustomed to (or heaven help us dependent on) this cash-flow.
Customer service for the residents is being provided by the haulers and paid for by our fees, so what value add has the county provided by it's monthly premium admin charge/fee/tax?
Kristi Reed
10:06 pm on Tuesday, March 5, 2013
Ed - Came here for this. Leaving satisfied.
M.K. Osborne
8:32 pm on Monday, March 4, 2013
The bottom line is the county has wanted to get in the garbage business for along time and rammed it through with enough smoke and mirrors that would make the county fair proud.
Randal Tart
9:25 am on Tuesday, March 5, 2013
Our county-selected provider wants more now for yard-waste-only service than our subdivision paid for all pickup, including yard waste, recycling, etc. And, I could fire them if they did not provide good service. Oh, and I didn't run the risk of losing my home through a tax lien if I chose not to pay them.
"Public servants say, always with the best of intentions, "What greater service we could render if only we had a little more money and a little more power." But the truth is that outside of its legitimate function, government does nothing as well or as economically as the private sector."
Ronald Reagan
George Wilson
5:28 pm on Tuesday, March 5, 2013
"There is always a well-known solution to every human problem--neat, plausible, and wrong." or For every problem, there is a neat, simple solution, and it is always wrong.
H. L. Mencken,
Ed Varn
9:35 pm on Tuesday, March 5, 2013
You're right, George. There's also the case of a solution looking for a problem. Which is what this whole trash pickup boondoggle is.
R++ - One of the famous "Dacula Crew"
10:12 pm on Tuesday, March 5, 2013
Why George you are correct.
Would someone please ask those commissioners that brought forth this change and PROMISED far and wide for all to hear just what happened to the PROMISES they each made that there would be competitive bidding for hauler selection by district? Most county contracts prior to 2006 were routinely let this way, what specifically changed?
Mack
9:13 pm on Tuesday, March 5, 2013
This whole mess has been created by one who resigned or face jail time, another one who is in the process of being convicted and one who admitted to taking a bribe. Now what does that tell you about this whole garbage mess that we have now. We were told that the recycle program may pay for some of the cost of the program. Connie Wiggins is a private business,501C3 non profit, that has not paid anything to reduce costs. cost has risen each year since this plan has started. The county is making $$$$ from collecting the taxes in advance by interest on these accounts. We should let the free enterprise system take over this market and we may see a reduction in cost. Our neighborhood contracted with a hauler and got more services with less costs. Prior to that my employer permitted his employees to use the company dumpster. the hauler we had was not one that is currently used by the county. It is a money game and we as citizens are the one providing the money.
Jim Hinkle
5:13 pm on Wednesday, March 6, 2013
Grayson solved the problems alluded to by giving the citizens free trash service without raising taxes. We also did competitive bidding. Maybe it's because we manage money better than anyone else?
R++ - One of the famous "Dacula Crew"
10:36 pm on Thursday, March 7, 2013
That can happen when leaders keep out of the Federal playpens...
Dacula O
10:23 am on Sunday, March 10, 2013
We moved to Georgia in 2005, comino from Florida and Connecricut. I thought it odd that the trash service here was a separate service/bill to deal with. In those other states it is part of the property, along with some surcharge for the street lights. Don't know if the trash hauling was county employees or subcontracted, and I don't think it makes a dfference. They provided a basic service, and were good at it. Now several years later we have the same thing here. One less thing to worry about shopping/paying and they are doing their job.
Pischer
4:26 pm on Sunday, March 10, 2013
I appreciate only one set of trucks coming through one day a week. Whomever thinks it's the same with UPS and FedEx trucks, shoud walk past a trash truck. Trash trucks are larger, heavier, and much, much stinkier. I didn't like my choice being taken away, but for the increase in recyclables, the service is better. And when I've complained directly to the hauler, I've gotten results. if not, I'd be complaining to my county commissioner.