.
Feedback

Filibuster or Filibluster?

With all that needs to be done to give leadership, it seems we could, for such a time as this, seek to find solutions rather than fighting for headlines.

In the political world, it has come down to the issue, person, or event able to grab the most headlines. We no longer seem to be moving in the direction of conviction or ideology when dealing with the issues of the day, but vying for the sound bite and the interview by a celebrity news person.

The evidence for this opinion was seen last week when Senator Rand Paul from Kentucky took to the Senate floor in Washington and filibustered for more than 13 hours.  Since the long marathon on the Senate floor, Paul was called almost every name in the book, and mostly by those who claim the same party affiliation. As Sen. Paul took to the Senate floor, news outlets began to announce his intention to lead a filibuster because of a concern he had expressed in not receiving the answer he sought from the President on the use of drone strikes against American citizens on American soil.

We could take the majority of this article and rehash the points made and the counterpoints made since the filibuster but the issue, at least for me, is what we are seeing happen in the political world and the desire to be first, with the largest amount of ink being used, to report the event or issue. We seem to no longer be at a place where we have shared vision or dreams for this nation, but we are seeing the celebrity politicians get in line to have their name out front and to have their sound bite on the news the longest and loudest.

Full disclosure causes me to admit I was pleased to listen too much of what Sen. Paul said, and agreed with the sincere and passionate way he was presenting his case on the issue. At some point during Sen. Paul’s speech, I realized the headline seekers within the Republican Party would not be happy because of all the space in the media being given to the filibuster activities.

There was an axiom in leadership in a day gone by when it would be said, “It is amazing how much can be accomplished when it does not matter who gets the credit.” That axiom has now been laid aside and the push is to have the celebrity politicians getting all the glory and credit for anything said or done on an issue. The two senators from Arizona and South Carolina let it be known their displeasure of the way Sen. Paul conducted the filibuster, even to the point of accusing him of just pulling off a “stunt.”

From where I stand, it sounds like “sour grapes” to me, coming from these two senators, especially the way we see them grabbing headlines and seeking interviews that will place them in positions of prominence. With all that needs to be done to give leadership, it seems we could, for such a time as this, seek to find solutions rather than fighting for headlines.

Follow Ray Newman on Twitter @RayNewmanSr

You might also be interested in reading:

  • 'We the Government' Is Replacing 'We the People'
  • The End Is Near
  • I Have No Trust Left
  • We Need an Active Special Interest Group

 

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Dacula Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Robbi McCaig June 12, 2013 at 12:08 pm
"There are people in all levels of government office who would like nothing more than to beRead More able to conduct all the public business out of public view" The problem is, who's going to stop them? Certainly--no one from this justice department who is complicit in multiple overreaches and coverups.
Tammy Osier June 12, 2013 at 12:41 pm
I wrote this on another post but it so applies here and is worth repeating: James Madison wrote inRead More the federalist paper (no. 51) concerning the separation of powers and need for limited government , "“ It may be a reflection on human nature, that such devices should be necessary to control the abuses of government. But what is government itself, but the greatest of all reflections on human nature? If men were angels, no government would be necessary. If angels were to govern men, neither external nor internal controls on government would be necessary. In framing a government which is to be administered by men over men, the great difficulty lies in this: you must first enable the government to control the governed; and in the next place oblige it to control itself. A dependence on the people is, no doubt, the primary control on the government……” We need to have a "Madison moment"...
Tammy Osier June 12, 2013 at 12:41 pm
I remember when I opened up the news to see that Holder was going to investigate Holder. Ha! What'sRead More scary is that there are some who think that's just fine?
Pam Stroud April 8, 2013 at 07:20 am
Where is this place located? Might know of a good family for one of these little adoptees.