.

Beaudreau vs. Hunter: Who Will Get Your Vote?

The Gwinnett County District 3 commission race will be decided during the Aug. 21 runoff.

With 47 percent of the vote, . Beaudreau will now face second place finisher Tommy Hunter in the Aug. 21 runoff.

In June, . Here, in their entirety, are the answers provided by Beaudreau and Hunter:

1.) 

Beaudreau: When the new Board of Commissioners is sworn in in January, at least four of the five seats will be held by individuals with a maximum of two years in county government.  I decided to run for a third and final term because I believe the experience I bring to the Board will be useful as we work to rebuild from the damage caused by the recession and from the loss of trust due to the actions of former commissioners.  

Hunter: I believe that government's role is to serve the people. I believe government must be less involved in the lives of people in the course of business.  I feel these views have slowly, over time, eroded in the minds of those seeking public office and I want to re-introduce it to the County Commission. I want to use my experience from working in the county government to help people understand how their government works.   For too long I feel representatives have kept those they represent in the dark when it comes to how and why decisions are made.  My experience has taught me how to involve the people in the decision making process, paving the way to increasing the citizens' trust in their elected representatives.

2.) 

Beaudreau: My top priority is to promote economic development and job growth.   The recent downturn dealt a major blow to the county’s economy, from which we have not fully recovered.  The loss of jobs has meant that homeowners now make up too high a portion of the county’s tax base.

By bringing in more companies with high paying jobs, we can broaden the tax base and make way for reduced taxes. 

Hunter: My top priority will be addressing the issues which will affect the well being of our residents for years to come. A major issue is our source of drinking water.   Currently we have redundant systems for the treatment and distribution of drinking water, but only a single source under the control of the Federal government and challenged by our downstream neighbors.  In 2008, I was part of the County's Reservoir Study Committee. We used the opportunity of this committee to look at options for diversifying the County's water source and looked for ways to produce supplemental water sources to guard against future droughts and to supplement our withdrawals from Lake Lanier. We produced a report with several options--not nailing down any particular one--for County planners to look at. I believe that all possibilities should be looked at before any are discounted. To my knowledge, that report has never been acted upon, and it is time we have someone on the commission that understands the importance of a secure water source and will get the process moving now, before it is too late.    

3.) 

Beaudreau: A proposal to build a casino with video lottery terminals at the OFS site has been floated by a developer.  At this point, it is too early to tell if this proposal makes sense for the county.  As with the recent airport proposal, we have to approach decisions of this magnitude with caution and discretion.  Sometimes, what sounds good at the beginning may not look as attractive when the full research is completed.  I will keep an open mind, and if it is presented to the Board of Commissioners, I will decide yes or no based on the merits of the formal proposal.

Hunter: I am still trying to decide how I feel about this opportunity. Though I am well aware you cannot legislate values or morality--nor should in a free society--I am personally, through my faith, opposed to legalized gambling.  At the same time I am a constitutionalist conservative and do not believe in using the power of government to limit people to my way of believing, feeling, or living--so long as it does not encroach upon another's right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.  I say all that to say, that if shown to be a benefit to our community, I would support the people's wishes.

4.) 

Beaudreau: The county’s current contracts with the waste haulers are in effect for the next six years.  Any candidate that is promising to cancel or return to the old system within our term as Commissioner is not being truthful with the people.  Canceling these contracts to allow residents to select their own hauler would subject the county to likely penalties and lawsuits, which I could not support.  As a result, decisions regarding modifications will be made at least four years from now, after my final term on the Board would end.

Since the Board approved the current waste collection system, haulers have reported a tremendous increase in the amount of recycling.  In addition, the amount of waste collected has also increased.  That is resulted in our Commercial property owners seeing a decrease in the amount of illegally dumped waste in their dumpsters as well as a decrease in the amount of waste found along our streets. 

The Board recently modified the waste ordinance to provide for a rate reduction for senior citizens, and a method of waiving the fee for certain unoccupied houses.  Our internal surveys show the vast majority of residents are satisfied with the current system.

Hunter: Absolutely not.  I would support any effort to return to the citizens the power to choose who they do business with.  As a matter of fact, I do not believe government has the right to interfere with the citizens' right to choose who they do business with for any reason.  A free society and a free market comes with risks and inconveniences -- including more than one garbage company operating trucks in a neighborhood.  

5.) 

Beaudreau: The reduction in property tax revenues due to the recession has forced the Board of Commissioners to make some difficult decisions to reduce services.  In 2009, a citizen’s committee met for six months to study possible service consolidations and reductions, and released the Engage Gwinnett report.  The Board has implemented most of their suggestions, and is working on ways to implement the remaining ones.

I believe the county has made all the easy cuts available, and many painful ones.  Further reductions in services will have a big impact on the quality of life we enjoy.  That’s why I believe we must focus our efforts on increasing the commercial tax base in order to avoid further service reductions.

Hunter: I have several ideas and would weigh them against the question--is this absolutely essential to the safety and well being of our citizens.  I believe that the "needs" must be paid for first, and as efficiently as possible, before "wants" are even considered---just as how every household in Gwinnett County has to operate.   Anything not a "need" is subject to scaling back or elimination.  Even areas of those services deemed absolutely necessary can be operated more efficiently.   The citizens of Gwinnett County have had to roll up their sleeves and do "more with less", certainly the government that the citizens hard work supports can do the same.  

6.) 

Beaudreau: Since the grand jury report following the indictment of one former Commissioner and the resignation of another, I pushed for—and the Board has adopted—a new ethics ordinance and a revised procedure for property purchases.  These changes have given Gwinnett some of the strongest ethics policies of any county in the state. 

In the same way you can’t prevent a determined dog from jumping or digging its way out of his fenced-in yard, you can’t prevent a corrupt politician from being corrupt.  The county’s new ethics rules and other laws provide a strong deterrent to unethical behavior.  I do not see how additional changes would provide any meaningful deterrent to someone intent on breaking the law. 

Hunter: Engage the citizens and keep them involved. Engaged citizens are knowledgeable citizens who demand accountability and transparency.   Accountability and transparency keeps issues on the forefront and harder to hide what is going on behind closed doors. This is a two-way street. I will offer to be available and willing to answer questions, and the citizens must be involved and demand that I do so.

7.) 

Beaudreau: The three biggest issues facing the county over the next ten years are the water supply, the economy and the lack of trust in government at all levels.

Although the 11th circuit court overruled the draconian decision by Judge Magnuson that would have resulted in the virtual elimination of Lake Lanier as the county’s water supply, it also ordered further studies on the authority of the Corps of Engineers to regulate the drinking water supply from the lake.  These studies, plus the possibility of additional litigation pose a threat to the county’s water supply.

The county has been proactive in encouraging water conservation and being good stewards of the water in Lake Lanier.  We must continue our efforts to ensure the use of the lake as our drinking water source.

The economy continues to be an issue, both at a local and national level.  If there is a silver lining for the county, it’s that we’ve managed to have the lowest unemployment rate of the core metro counties for the last three years.  Fortune 500 company NCR relocated to Duluth in the middle of the recession. The county managed to keep its triple-triple A bond rating even as our nation’s credit rating was reduced. 

All of this was made possible by the efforts of the county and our partners, including Partnership Gwinnett, the Community Improvement Districts, and our cities.  We must continue to be proactive in bringing high-paying jobs to the county and fostering an environment that supports entrepreneurialism.

The citizens’ trust in government is at an all-time low.  At the county level, we’ve had the resignation of three commissioners over the last two years.  At the state legislature, there is an ongoing discussion over lobbyist gifts and expense report improprieties.  Nationally, only 15% approve of the job Congress is doing. 

Part of this is undoubtedly due to the strain people are going through as a result of the economy.  Another part is due to the class warfare policies adopted by the current President and the debate over the role of government that frames the 2012 elections. 

I am a small government conservative who has never voted to raise your taxes.  I’ve never taken a campaign contribution from a developer.  I’ve voted against spending county money on things that I believe are not a proper function of the government.  The only way that trust in government will improve is if the people believe that their elected representatives are acting responsibly and ethically.  I am doing my best to answer their call. 

Hunter: The declining value of property and the lack of jobs and new business; our transportation system and the ability to move people and commerce effectively; and our limitations in our ability to guarantee plentiful water for people and business.

For more information about Mike Beaudreau:

Campaign website:  www.mikebeaudreau.com
Campaign Facebook page:  Mike Beaudreau

Campaign Twitter account: @MikeBeaudreau

For more information about Tommy Hunter:

Campaign website:  www.ElectTommy.com
Campaign Facebook page:  Elect Tommy Hunter
 

 

You might also be interested in reading:

Don’t miss any local election news. Subscribe to Dacula Patch’s free newsletterlike us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.  

M.K. OSBORNE August 10, 2012 at 10:23 PM
I was so hate filled i forgot to also include Floyds question as one i would like to hear a reply also .
R++ One of the Famous Dacula Crew August 10, 2012 at 11:04 PM
@ “Pink” Floyd Well at least you acknowledge the Buzz… kinda And it would appear that out of 159 counties STATEWIDE, only Gwinnett incumbents need this protection in this election. Even though this feared, accused naysayer Joe Newton operates elsewhere? OR is this an example of yet ANOTHER program "jewel" that should go STATEWIDE, just like our NEW Trash Plan? Mike B When you ABSOLUTELY have to have MAJOR government policies that “overreach” overnight… whether citizens want them or NOT. And as a tribute to "Pink" Floyd - You can’t be a REAL hateR, without the “R” I AM…. INSUBORDINATE! All and all… it’s just another …. Brick in the WALL.
Floyd Akridge August 11, 2012 at 04:35 AM
No bricks required. My wall of truth and facts is plenty high enough as it is. You've tried to scale it numerous times without success. R...saying all the other counties haven't done this yet is not an impressive defense. People like Joe Newton don't operate where there are no people to show of too...that eliminates 65% of the counties off the bat. In addition, the policy hasn't been out that long at all...and someone has to be first by nature. That doesn't concern me.
Dave Ballard August 11, 2012 at 04:59 PM
And here I thought this was a hockey question: "Which of the last two coaches of the Washington Capitals did a better job overall, Bruce Beaudreau, or Dale Hunter?" Ah well....
Tim Sullivan August 11, 2012 at 05:12 PM
Ok but just because I've got work to do and can't wait for more gusses... Tom is and has been ever since he worked for the county a Real estate Developer and real Estate Broker. Oh and he also worked for a large contractor that does a tone of business for the county, Gary's Grading. It appears he left Gary's a couple of months after he assumed his duties of a Planning commissioner, a good thing I think. But wouldn't that be great for a large contractor to have a former empolyee as a county commissioner. Think of Tommy as a kinder and gentler Kevin Kenerly. From Tommy's Linked-In Profile. Gwinnett County Planning Commission January 2011 – Present (1 year 8 months) [I believe he resigned this position at the request of Commissioner Heard] District 4 Representative - Gwinnett County Planning Commission Project Manager Gary's Grading & Pipeline Co. August 2009 – May 2011 (1 year 10 months) Project manager over various state and county DOT projects and water and sewer projects for county and city governments. Of interest to folks in Gwinnett and Hall Counties I am managing the widening project of SR 20 from Grayson to Loganville, the Hurricane Shoals at Old Peachtree Intersection Improvement, Hope Hollow Road Realignment, and Thurman Tanner Parkway extension. (cont)
Tim Sullivan August 11, 2012 at 05:23 PM
(cont) Development Manager Landmark Improvement, LLC May 2004 – August 2009 (5 years 4 months) Served as Development Manager identifying and purchasing property for residential development, managing the design and construction phases, and overseeing the sale of the finished project. Another piece I found from a hunting web site he claims to be an Associate Broker (i.e. Real Estate) for 8 years. I remembered this piece from 2 years age so it should be more like the last 10 years which would include several years while working for the county. You can find Tommy listed on the Eagle Realty web site @ http://www.eaglerealtyservices.net/Our_Professionals/page_1944066.html
M.K. OSBORNE August 11, 2012 at 06:03 PM
So Tim , both are in the pocket for Gary Grading . How wonderful !
Tim Sullivan August 11, 2012 at 06:11 PM
So M.K. I suspect for you its back to the Devil ya know vs the Devil you don't.
M.K. OSBORNE August 11, 2012 at 07:54 PM
Not exactly Tim , I dispise arrogance toward any taxpayer and i prefer a person that will listen to the agreements and disagreements and humble thy self acknowledging that they are serving all instead of being a know it all .
J. Morley August 11, 2012 at 08:56 PM
Uh oh, Timothy, seems there is a problem with your revelation. You see you and Floyd get on here and talk all about Bootro's integrity and honesty but you missed one little thing. You say Mike has NEVER taken money from developers yet you claim that Tommy is, and always has been since he left the county, a developer. Looking at Mike's disclosures you will find Tommy gave Mike money in both February 2006 and February 2008--long AFTER Tommy left Gwinnett County. So, one of three things has occurred here. Either one, YOU are a liar; two, MIKE is a liar; or three, Mike intentionally and knowingly falsified his Campaign Disclosures. Which is it? For the record, I've looked at Mike's disclosures and he has taken money from PLENTY of developers--or at least developers by your definition. And a question for you, is being in real estate a crime or an illegal profession? I see that is how you make your living. Wonder how some of those developers and builders you work with would appreciate your description of, and insinations about, them?
Tim Sullivan August 11, 2012 at 09:47 PM
Nope I never said Mike never took developer money, he did and he has answered the charge that he took developers money at the Stars and Stripes debate. I accept his answer. By Tommy’s admission he was a developer, for several years with his own company and he worked for Garry’s grading. He also holds a real estate license as well as a broker’s license. Working in Real estate while on the county payroll is what got him in trouble while at Gwinnett County. No, being in Real; Estate it is not a crime. It is a noble profession, done right.. I work in Residential Real estate and never hid the fact. That is transparency. Hiding the fact is not. I disclosed & Tommy did not. Don’t believe I made any insinuations about developers and builders, just Tommy. Again my problem is that he is not forth coming with information about his career. What I find disturbing is that he has never disclosed his various other positions. All he talks about is being an engineer and an expert in transportation. So everyone just assumes that is his job. It just makes me wonder why not disclose. All of you Tommy supporters are all so ticked off about a stupid trash plan that y’all will vote for anybody without asking questions. No one properly vetted Obama and look at the mess that got us into. I suspect if Jerry of Korumn had gotten into the runoff you would be just as vehemently supporting that person as well. Vote for him if you will but find out who he is; don’t just blindly vote for him
J. Morley August 11, 2012 at 11:17 PM
From Floyd, speaking from his knowledge of the Beaudreau campaign on Monday, August 6, 2012 on the article "Beaudreau headed for Runoff....": "*Mike has yet to take a single financial contribution from a developer." So I guess we are down to two choices, Mike is a liar, or he falsified his disclosures.
Tim Sullivan August 12, 2012 at 06:44 PM
Meet the Runoff Candidates. Wednesday August 15th @ 6:30pm until 8:30pm. It's at GJAC. be ther or be squair Before you vote on August 21st, hear from the candidates for State Court, Superior Court and Commission District 3 in a moderated forum.
J. Morley August 12, 2012 at 08:15 PM
Still waiting Timothy. Which is it? Mike is a liar, or he falsified his disclosures. I'll be at the debate and I'm really looking forward to it. I didnt get to make the last one.
Tim Sullivan August 12, 2012 at 08:51 PM
J would have replied earlier but couldn't find your post and I am at work, got to serve the customers. Mike neither falsafied nor lied about developer donations. At the last meeting Jerry O raised questions about taking contributions from a company that makes culvert pipe. Jerry claimed they were developers, Mike said no they were maufactures. The devil is in the details. As to Tommy well it depends on what he told Mike his occupation was. I don't have time to at the present to search through the disclosures to see what was put down as Tommy's occupation. So i'll leave that ffor another day. Oh there really is no place on the disclosure forms to indicate one is a developer or not :-)
J. Morley August 13, 2012 at 01:58 AM
I hear crickets................................
J. Morley August 13, 2012 at 02:30 AM
Timothy, what you meant to say is it took you a day to get with Mike to find out how to respond. In the meantime I talked to Tommy as well. And, as you should well know, every disclosure asks for the OCCUPATION and EMPLOYER of individual contributors. So if one is a developer, then that's where it goes. Tommy was Mike's Water and Sewerage Authority representative at the time. Mike knew darn well what Tommy did (does). I wonder what that MHC DEVELOPMENT that gave Mike TWO THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS in February 2008 does. Oh, I bet they sell used cars. The devil is in the details, alright, and I'll wager that any straight-thinking, intelligent Gwinnett resident would know EXACTLY who the devil is. So, if the owner of XYZ Development and Home Builder says it is a plumbing business then that's what it is as far as Mike is concerned and he can take their money??? That sounds like honesty and integrity. It is the candidate's responsibility to know what the person giving the gift does and who they work for, it is the candidate's CHOICE to choose not to be honest with his constituents.
Floyd Akridge August 13, 2012 at 03:18 AM
J...You're barking at something you think is a thang but isn't. You're fooling yourself and committing a serious political error. August 22nd, in sincerity, I will tell you what it is.
Floyd Akridge August 13, 2012 at 03:22 AM
By the way J...you're making yourself look like a hysterical idiot. The quote you attribute to my knowledge of the campaign posted on August 6th was in fact a direct quote from Mike's website. You are starting to sound a bit on the desperate side.
J. Morley August 13, 2012 at 11:04 AM
@ Floyd The only hysterical idiot here is Timothy. He barked up the wrong tree. He put his foot so far down his throat he cant catch his breath. The only sign of desperation comes from yalls side. I bet Mr. ethics in gwinnett would like Timothy to quit posting on the patch. Nice try Timothy, but it didnt work. I got to go I'm playing golf at summit chase this am. Yall boys dont let me down so I'll have something to look forward to when I get done!
J. Morley August 13, 2012 at 01:06 PM
@ Floyd, so you have a DIRECT quote from Mike's website claiming he NEVER took developer money; then you have his lap-dog Tim Sullivan saying he did but has answered the charge; then we have you in many other places talking about how honest and full of integrity Mike is (promises made, promises kept); then we have obvious instances on his disclosures where he failed to record peoples' correct occupations (because he knows putting "developer" on a disclosure would make him a liar); AND then you refer to me as a hysterical idiot? I always attributed that kind of reasoning to democrats, but apparently it applies to incumbents, hell-bent on staying in power, in general.
Floyd Akridge August 13, 2012 at 11:54 PM
No J...you're getting on the desperate side with the latest rounds of attacks on Commissioner Beaudreau's integrity.
Floyd Akridge August 14, 2012 at 12:04 AM
J...I don't speak for Tim....Tim does. I speak for me and what I know. Thank you, btw, for giving me the chance to respond to you and yet again talk about Commissioner Beaudreau's integrity. You quoted me correctly...it is "Promises Made...Promises Kept". Just like Jim Regan and his attempt to smear Commissioner Beaudreau in those tiny video snips doesn't understand that the very existence of the chance to do the video proves that Commissioner Beaudreau keeps his promises. You also fail to understand that your desperate attempts to show that Commissioner Beaudreau took a contribution from a friend of a friend of a friend of a neighbor of a postman who saw someone say they were a developer on TV remind everyone that the only reason you are doing so is because of a promise made that has been kept. It doesn't matter to you that your guy has gulped down developer contributions. It, thus, comes down to being obvious that it's not developer contributions but the keeping of one's word that is the object behind the curtain for you. I'm good with that...like you CORRECTLY QUOTED me....Promises Made...Promises Kept.
Jim Regan August 14, 2012 at 01:10 AM
Whoa there Floyd! To start with, 15 minutes of raw unedited video filmed and posted by the media does not qualify as a snipet. I know it's hard to defend the words and immature behavior of Beaudreau, so why don't you just concede he failed to meet the expectations of an elected official and we can leave it at that. These three videos are not the most damning, there is one more that is not posted on YouTube, perhaps tomorrow I will post it. Once again I didn't film it but it was a little too inflammatory. I'll sleep on it tonight. I would also like to point out at subsequent meetings Mike would only meet with individuals and would not address the group of 20 persons attending his Saturday meetings that wanted to discuss Briscoe expansion. Apparently he didn't want to many witnesses nor have to deal with people questioning his position. Once again I am not smearing Beaudreau I am just providing information which people have a right to know about their commissioner. Unfortunately most voters have not had the exposure nor attended commission meetings. I have to admit at every meeting I've attended someone has always commented they can not believe the immaturity nor disrespect for citizens' opinions. It seems to me an elected official has a responsiblity to set aside their personal opinion to represent the opinion of the electorate. If that were the case with Beaudreau we would not be having this discussion.
Floyd Akridge August 14, 2012 at 01:36 AM
Thank you Jim for yet another opportunity to talk about Commissioner Beaudreau keeping his promises. Explain to me exactly how many politicians (I actually refer to Commissioner Beaudreau as a public servant) intentionally give up portions of their weekends to meet with the people they serve. Sitting here now, frankly, I cannot think of any. That was a promised from Mike Beaudreau when he was Candidate Beaudreau in 2004. We put it on our big signs (those enormous 4x8 footers) for everyone to see. It wasn't an accident....it was a Promise Made. Making a promise meant something to him...then and now. Is it an accident that he's done so month after month after month (approaching 90 months now btw)? Absolutely not. Remember that he has a daughter less than a year old now so his weekend time comes at an even greater expense. But it was a Promise Made. Again...you haven't been able to criticize him for keeping that promise have you? Answer...NO. Thank you for reminding everyone here that with Commissioner Beaudreau it's...Promise Made...Promise Kept. Lets also remind the readers here that it is Jim Regan who got the EXACT decision regarding Briscoe that you wanted but because he didn't follow your self made primrose path you give him no credit for making the decision...the exact decision...that you wanted. Criticizing Commissioner Beaudreau because he gave you what you wanted can only be described as Circle Logic. Promise Made....Promise Kept. Commissioner Mike Beaudreau
R++ One of the Famous Dacula Crew August 15, 2012 at 04:58 AM
The odds of a successful suit being brought up over the airport "result" was markedly reduced due to Chairwoman Nash using Gwinnett Procurement policies in place from the start. This is in STARK contrast to the trash fiasco where the 5 commissioners decided to basically ignore Gwinnett County Procurement policy right from the get go back in 2006. THAT decision left us all holding the bag for 10 years of artificially higher rates - after signing a consent order that offered unusual protections / consideration to the signers. We keep getting told that we CAN'T do anything about it, BUT that is coming from some who DIRECTLY personally benefits while this consent decree is in place, so its taken with a grain of salt because of the CLEAR conflict of interest that consent agreement contains. So if a elected official promises publicly during BoC business sessions no less, that the hauler selection within regions would be based on public competitive bidding processes and yet in 2010 the Gwinnett Lawyers tell the Judge "for the record" that competitive bidding is NOT required at all because trash is a "core" government service, have we actually received "ethical" treatment or is it just an oversight?
R++ One of the Famous Dacula Crew August 15, 2012 at 05:12 AM
When the 2009 Grand Jury findings list that ALL sitting commissioners ran county business poorly and didn't bother to prepare, ignored departmental inputs or staff recommendations was this ethical, an oversight or the beginning of a trend? Have we seen enough changes since 2009 or are county staff still being treated shabbily as late as 2011, is this "ethical", an oversight or a sheer example of an inability to take and act on constructive feedback? View the BoC meeting video dated 8/23/11 at the GWINNETT COUNTY site http://www.gwinnettcounty.com/portal/gwinnett/Departments/CountyAdministrator/Communications/TVGwinnett/VideoOnDemand/CommissionMeetingVideos See this segment listed below 2011-0761 Approval to clarify the actions previously approved bt yhe BOC on May 3, 2011, and May 17, 2011, related to the proposed privatization of Brisco Field. Time: 01:07:57 - 02:02:00 http://view.liveindexer.com/ViewIndexSessionSLMQ.aspx?indexPointSKU=ppQ6S2Egz8gRyq60JUrqqA%3d%3d This will show you why I'm so PROUDLY..... INSUBORDINATE!
R++ One of the Famous Dacula Crew August 15, 2012 at 06:30 AM
No ... what it really just depends on "is" what "is" the definition of a developer ... We've ALL been here before, we're just missin the "Devil in the Blue Dress" is all. (Smiles)
R++ One of the Famous Dacula Crew August 16, 2012 at 03:30 AM
Attended the forum ... Heard from the 3 sets of candidates. Listened intently to the conservative cost cutting experience track record over the last 8 years in district 3. And for the life of me, each time I heard that claim of a "proven track record" as we face a future of having to make tough choices about service levels and revenues WE pay... ALL I could picture was CoolRay Gwinnett staduim hanging around his neck as if it were a commode lid... Isn't a shame we residents just didn't cut up the credit card sooner? We LOCK in spending on MAJOR projects for 10 to 30 years, but budget income yearly... Elsewhere Kathy Schrader for Superior Court - gets best performance for the evening by far. Hit the ground at a gallop and NEVER slowed down. Ms Tracey Mason Blasi gets credit for showing up, it took fortitude for her to sit on that panel. It was Senior Varsity against JR Varsity. Cont.
R++ One of the Famous Dacula Crew August 16, 2012 at 03:31 AM
Strong surprise of the night goes to Pam Britt for State Court Right out of the shoot, she systematically dissected a recent mailing by her opponent line by line. When it came to voting records, she had the facts to point out the errors, even the moderator found the claim made by Emily Brantley of Pam Britt being a "liberal democrat" after being shown proof of Pam's voting 6 of the last 7 primaries as a republican perplexing. The closing comments were a hoot too. Emily Brantley attempted to somewhat clone or apply the closing presentation of Ms Kathy Schrader about experience to herself. (Kathy Schrader's stark comparison in her race concerning her record and achievements was THAT strong) and again went to Pam Britt's voting records, claiming residents weren't interested in a record of 30 years ago... Pam Britt wrapped it up showing she voted in the LAST 7 primaries Since like 2000, a voting record Emily couldn't even match herself. If a Judge is charged with keeping lawyers "on the green" in the court room without an overflow of theatrics, Pam Britt demonstrated the even keel personality trait required and should win based on that imho. Generally speaking, I usually find myself on the same side as Butch Conway, but in this case, he may have gotten it wrong in his support of Emily Brantley... At any rate it wasn't Emily's best night

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something